Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28745933›Full record

ReviewRNA biology2017

Does eIF3 promote reinitiation after translation of short upstream ORFs also in mammalian cells?

Vladislava Hronová, Mahabub Pasha Mohammad, Susan Wagner, Josef Pánek, Stanislava Gunišová, Jakub Zeman, Kristýna Poncová, Leoš Shivaya Valášek

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RNA biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Stress-responsive roles of thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A dynamic compositional equilibrium governs mRNA recognition by eIF3.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Rebirth of the translational machinery: The importance of recycling ribosomes.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vladislava Hronováa Laboratory of Regulation of Gene Expression , Institute of Microbiology ASCR , Videnska, Prague , the Czech Republic.
Mahabub Pasha Mohammada Laboratory of Regulation of Gene Expression , Institute of Microbiology ASCR , Videnska, Prague , the Czech Republic.
Susan Wagnera Laboratory of Regulation of Gene Expression , Institute of Microbiology ASCR , Videnska, Prague , the Czech Republic.
Josef Pánekc Laboratory of Bioinformatics , Institute of Microbiology ASCR , Videnska, Prague , the Czech Republic.
Stanislava Gunišováa Laboratory of Regulation of Gene Expression , Institute of Microbiology ASCR , Videnska, Prague , the Czech Republic.
Jakub Zemana Laboratory of Regulation of Gene Expression , Institute of Microbiology ASCR , Videnska, Prague , the Czech Republic.
Kristýna Poncováa Laboratory of Regulation of Gene Expression , Institute of Microbiology ASCR , Videnska, Prague , the Czech Republic.
Leoš Shivaya Valášeka Laboratory of Regulation of Gene Expression , Institute of Microbiology ASCR , Videnska, Prague , the Czech Republic.
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Microbiology · CZCharles University · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reinitiation after translation of short upstream ORFs (uORFs) represents one of the means of regulation of gene expression on the mRNA-specific level in response to changing environmental conditions. Over the years it has been shown-mainly in budding yeast-that its efficiency depends on cis-acting features occurring in sequences flanking reinitiation-permissive uORFs, the nature of their coding sequences, as well as protein factors acting in trans. We earlier demonstrated that the first two uORFs from the reinitiation-regulated yeast GCN4 mRNA leader carry specific structural elements in their 5' sequences that interact with the translation initiation factor eIF3 to prevent full ribosomal recycling post their translation. Actually, this interaction turned out to be instrumental in stabilizing the mRNA·40S post-termination complex, which is thus capable to eventually resume scanning and reinitiate on the next AUG start site downstream. Recently, we also provided important in vivo evidence strongly supporting the long-standing idea that to stimulate reinitiation, eIF3 has to remain bound to ribosomes elongating these uORFs until their stop codon has been reached. Here we examined the importance of eIF3 and sequences flanking uORF1 of the human functional homolog of yeast GCN4, ATF4, in stimulation of efficient reinitiation. We revealed that the molecular basis of the reinitiation mechanism is conserved between yeasts and humans.

Indexed as

Open Reading FramesPeptide Chain Initiation, TranslationalActivating Transcription Factor 4AnimalsEukaryotic Initiation Factor-3HumansMammalsProtein BiosynthesisRibosomesRNA, MessengerActivating Transcription Factor 4Eukaryotic Initiation Factor-3RNA, MessengerATF4eIF3GCN4mRNAreinitiationribosometranslational control

Identifiers

PMID28745933
PMCPMC5731805
OpenAlexW2739106951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.