Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28745264›Full record

ArticlePsychological medicine2018

Shared genetic influences do not explain the association between parent-offspring relationship quality and offspring internalizing problems: results from a Children-of-Twins study.

L J Hannigan, F V Rijsdijk, J M Ganiban, D Reiss, E L Spotts, J M Neiderhiser, P Lichtenstein, T A McAdams, T C Eley

Abstract readTwin Study
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Maternal and paternal effects on offspring internalizing problems: Results from genetic and family-based analyses.American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

L J HanniganInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, MRC Social, Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry Centre, King's College London,London,UK.
F V RijsdijkInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, MRC Social, Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry Centre, King's College London,London,UK.
J M GanibanDepartment of Psychology,The George Washington University,Washington, DC,USA.
D ReissYale Child Study Center,New Haven, CT,USA.
E L SpottsOffice of Behavioral and Social Science Research, NIH,Bethesda, MD,USA.
J M NeiderhiserDepartment of Psychology,The Pennsylvania State University,State College, PA,USA.
P LichtensteinDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics,Karolinksa Institutet,Stockholm,Sweden.
T A McAdamsInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, MRC Social, Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry Centre, King's College London,London,UK.
T C EleyInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, MRC Social, Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry Centre, King's College London,London,UK.

Funding

GENES, ENVIRONMENT, AND MATERNAL ADJUSTMENTR01MH054610 · NIMH · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI NEIDERHISER, JENAE M. · 1996 to 2006
$2.7M
Medical Research Council G120/635NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH054610Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 107706/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAssociations between parenting and child outcomes are often interpreted as reflecting causal, social influences. However, such associations may be confounded by genes common to children and their biological parents. To the extent that these shared genes influence behaviours in both generations, a passive genetic mechanism may explain links between them. Here we aim to quantify the relative importance of passive genetic v. social mechanisms in the intergenerational association between parent-offspring relationship quality and offspring internalizing problems in adolescence.

methodsWe used a Children-of-Twins (CoT) design with data from the parent-based Twin and Offspring Study of Sweden (TOSS) sample [909 adult twin pairs and their offspring; offspring mean age 15.75 (2.42) years], and the child-based Swedish Twin Study of CHild and Adolescent Development (TCHAD) sample [1120 adolescent twin pairs; mean age 13.67 (0.47) years]. A composite of parent-report measures (closeness, conflict, disagreements, expressions of affection) indexed parent-offspring relationship quality in TOSS, and offspring self-reported internalizing symptoms were assessed using the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) in both samples.

resultsA social transmission mechanism explained the intergenerational association [r = 0.21 (0.16-0.25)] in our best-fitting model. A passive genetic transmission pathway was not found to be significant, indicating that parental genetic influences on parent-offspring relationship quality and offspring genetic influences on their internalizing problems were non-overlapping.

conclusionThese results indicate that this intergenerational association is a product of social interactions between children and parents, within which bidirectional effects are highly plausible. Results from genetically informative studies of parenting-related effects should be used to help refine early parenting interventions aimed at reducing risk for psychopathology.

Indexed as

Gene-Environment InteractionGenetics, BehavioralParent-Child RelationsAdolescentAdultChild of Impaired ParentsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedParentsPsychopathologySelf ReportSwedenTwinsBehavioural geneticschildren-of-twinsgene-environment correlationinternalizing problemsparent-child relationship

Identifiers

PMID28745264
PMCPMC5964471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.