Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28745122›Full record

ReviewNanomedicine (London, England)2017

Cell membrane-derived nanoparticles: emerging clinical opportunities for targeted drug delivery.

Svetlana T Yurkin, Zhenjia Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nanomedicine (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Biomimetic cell membrane-coated poly(lactic-Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Recent progress of macrophage vesicle-based drug delivery systems.Drug delivery and translational research · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Cell-Inspired Biomaterials for Modulating Inflammation.Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Svetlana T YurkinCollege of Pharmacy, Washington State University, Spokane, WA 99210, USA.
Zhenjia WangDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Washington State University, Spokane, WA 99210, USA.

Funding

Caveolar Transport of Therapeutic NanoparticlesK25HL111157 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, ZHENJIA · 2012 to 2016
$621k
NHLBI NIH HHS K25 HL111157
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofunctionalization of nanoparticles (NPs) is an essential component in targeted drug delivery. However, current nanotechnology remains inadequate to imitate complex intercellular interactions existing in physiological conditions in human bodies. Emerging concepts have been explored to utilize human cells to generate cell membrane-formed NPs because cells retain inherent abilities to interact with human tissues compared with synthetic nanomaterials. Neutrophils, red blood cells (RBCs), platelets and monocytes have been employed to form therapeutic NPs to treat vascular disease and cancer, and these novel drug delivery platforms show the translation potential to improve patient quality of life. In this review, we will discuss the concept of cell membrane-formed NPs, the molecular mechanisms of their disease targeting and the potential of personalized nanomedicine.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsAntineoplastic AgentsBlood PlateletsCell MembraneDrug CarriersErythrocytesHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyMonocytesNanomedicineNanoparticlesNeoplasmsNeutrophilsVascular DiseasesAnti-Inflammatory AgentsAntineoplastic AgentsDrug Carrierscell-derived nanovesiclesinflammationnanotechnology

Identifiers

PMID28745122
PMCPMC5551523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.