Trial reportClinical implant dentistry and related research2017
Evaluation of complication rates and vertical bone gain after guided bone regeneration with non-resorbable membranes versus titanium meshes and resorbable membranes. A randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in Clinical implant dentistry and related research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 80 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Guided Bone Regeneration Using Fixed vs Non-Fixed Resorbable Collagen Membranes: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Vertical and Horizontal Ridge Augmentation With Titanium-Reinforced Dense PTFE Versus Reinforced PTFE Mesh: A Prospective Comparative Case Series
Who cites it
80 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Efficacy of engineered scaffolds for horizontal and vertical ridge augmentation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of periodontology · 2026Pooled it
- Clinical Outcomes of Titanium Mesh for Alveolar Bone Augmentation: An Umbrella Review.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2025Pooled it
- Comparison between CAD/CAM titanium mesh vs. conventional titanium mesh in bone regeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of implant dentistry · 2025Pooled it
- Effect of Different Membranes on Vertical Bone Regeneration: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.BioMed research international · 2022Pooled it
- Trial
- Impact of Collagen Membrane in Vertical Ridge Augmentation Using Ti-Reinforced PTFE Mesh: A Randomised Controlled Trial.Journal of clinical periodontology · 2025Trial
- A 3D micro-CT assessment of composition and structure of bone tissue after vertical and horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation using CAD/CAM-customized titanium mesh.Clinical oral implants research · 2024Trial
- Complication, vertical bone gain, volumetric changes after vertical ridge augmentation using customized reinforced PTFE mesh or Ti-mesh. A non-inferiority randomized clinical trial.Clinical oral implants research · 2024Trial
- Vertical and horizontal ridge augmentation using customized CAD/CAM titanium mesh with versus without resorbable membranes. A randomized clinical trial.Clinical oral implants research · 2021Trial
- Guided bone regeneration simultaneous with implant placement using bovine-derived xenograft with and without liquid platelet-rich fibrin: a randomized controlled clinical trial.Clinical oral investigations · 2021Trial
- Evaluation of complication rates and vertical bone gain after guided bone regeneration with non-resorbable membranes versus titanium meshes and resorbable membranes. A randomized clinical trial.Clinical implant dentistry and related research · 2017Trial
- New technologies in oral reconstructive medicine: Consensus report of the AAP/OF/SEPA Workshop.Journal of periodontology · 2026Article
- Sinus-Plate Augmentation Method (SPAM) for Lateral Ridge Augmentation in the Maxillary Posterior Area: A Case Series.Oral health & preventive dentistry · 2026Article
- Initial wound healing following interrupted closing sutures with versus without tension-relieving mattress suture in guided bone regeneration: a preliminary randomized clinical trial.Journal of periodontal & implant science · 2026Article
- Guided Bone Regeneration for Vertical Alveolar Augmentation: Clinical Evaluation of d-PTFE-Ti Membranes and Comparison with Collagen Membranes: A Systematic Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Bone Ring Grafts Versus Non-Resorbable Membrane GBR for Vertical Ridge Augmentation: A Prospective Cohort Study.Oral health & preventive dentistry · 2026Article
- Vertical and Horizontal Ridge Augmentation with Titanium-Reinforced Dense PTFE and Reinforced PTFE Mesh: A Prospective Comparative Case Series.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Customized Titanium Mesh vs. Screw Tent-Pole Grafting: A Retrospective Study.Clinical implant dentistry and related research · 2026Article
- Failures and complications associated with resorbable and non-resorbable membranes in guided bone regeneration: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal · 2026Article
- Guided transpositional bone blocks in esthetic zone: Surgical technique and case report.Clinical advances in periodontics · 2026Article
20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe partial edentulous posterior mandible is often a challenge area that requires a bone reconstructive surgery for implants placement. PURPOSE: This RCT was aimed to evaluate complications rate and vertical bone gain after Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) with dense non-resorbable d-PTFE titanium-reinforced membranes (Group A) versus titanium meshes covered by cross-linked collagen membranes (Group B). MATERIAL AND
methods40 partially edentulous patients with atrophic posterior mandible, were randomly divided into two study group: 20 patients were treated with one stage GBR by means of non-resorbable d-PTFE titanium-reinforced membranes (Group A); and 20 patients, by means of titanium mesh covered by cross-linked collagen membranes (Group B). All complications were recorded, distinguishing between "surgical" and "healing" and between "minor" or "major.". Primary implants stability and vertical bone gain were also evaluated.
resultsIn the group A, surgical and healing complication rates were 5.0% and 15.0%, respectively. In the group B, surgical and healing complication rates were 15.8% and 21.1%, respectively. No significant differences between two study group were observed regarding complications rate implant stability and vertical bone gain.
conclusionsBoth GBR approaches for the restoration of atrophic posterior mandible achieved similar results regarding complications, vertical bone gain and implant stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.