Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28745021›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2017

The impact of T1 versus EPI spatial normalization templates for fMRI data analyses.

Vince D Calhoun, Tor D Wager, Anjali Krishnan, Keri S Rosch, Karen E Seymour, Mary Beth Nebel, Stewart H Mostofsky, Prashanth Nyalakanai, Kent Kiehl

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 205 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
205citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

205 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 321 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Gestational PBDE concentrations and functional connectivity in adolescents: The HOME Study.International journal of hygiene and environmental health · 2026
    Article

145 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vince D CalhounThe Mind Research Network & LBERI, Albuquerque, New Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-9058-0747
Tor D WagerUniversity of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, Colorado.
Anjali KrishnanUniversity of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, Colorado.
Keri S RoschCenter for Neurodevelopmental and Imaging Research, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland.
Karen E SeymourCenter for Neurodevelopmental and Imaging Research, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland.
Mary Beth NebelCenter for Neurodevelopmental and Imaging Research, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland.
Stewart H MostofskyCenter for Neurodevelopmental and Imaging Research, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland.
Prashanth NyalakanaiThe Mind Research Network & LBERI, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Kent KiehlThe Mind Research Network & LBERI, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Kennedy Krieger Institute · USMind Research Network · US

Funding

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Treatment of Auditory Verbal HalluciP20GM103472 · NIGMS · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI CALHOUN, VINCE D · 2012 to 2017
$14.3M
Multivariate methods for identifying multitask/multimodal brain imaging biomarkersR01EB006841 · NIBIB · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI VINCE D CALHOUN, Sergey Plis · 2007 to 2026
$9.8M
Neurology of Deficient Response Control in ADHDR01MH085328 · NIMH · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI MOSTOFSKY, STEWART H · 2009 to 2019
$7.3M
Anomalous Motor Physiology In ADHDR01MH078160 · NIMH · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI MOSTOFSKY, STEWART H · 2006 to 2024
$5.8M
Informed Data-Driven Fusion of Behavior, Brain Function, and GenesR01EB005846 · NIBIB · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI CALHOUN, VINCE D · 2005 to 2016
$5.5M
Socioemotional processing in female offenders - Resubmission 01R01MH109329 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI DECETY, JEAN, KIEHL, KENT A · 2016 to 2020
$3.6M
Brain changes and outcomes accompanying evidence-based treatment in high-risk youthR01HD082257 · NICHD · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI CALDWELL, MICHAEL F., KIEHL, KENT A · 2015 to 2020
$3.5M
Multi-group semi-blind ICA of fMRIR01EB000840 · NIBIB · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI CALHOUN, VINCE D · 2003 to 2011
$3.2M
Action Monitoring, Action Observation and Dopamine Genes as Predictors of SubstanR01DA026964 · NIDA · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI KIEHL, KENT A · 2010 to 2014
$2.9M
Unified multivariate data-driven solutions for static and dynamic brain connectivityR01EB020407 · NIBIB · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI ADALI, TULAY, CALHOUN, VINCE D · 2015 to 2018
$2.7M
Somatosensory Inhibitory Dysfunction in Autism Spectrum Disorder.R01MH106564 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI EDDEN, RICHARD ANTHONY EDWARD · 2016 to 2020
$2.5M
Neurobehavioral Correlates of Frustration in Children with ADHDK23MH107734 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SEYMOUR, KAREN E · 2015 to 2019
$815k
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB000840NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB005846NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB006841NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB020407NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD082257NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA026964NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103472NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH109766NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH101322NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH107734NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH078160NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH085328NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH106564NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH109329
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spatial normalization of brains to a standardized space is a widely used approach for group studies in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. Commonly used template-based approaches are complicated by signal dropout and distortions in echo planar imaging (EPI) data. The most widely used software packages implement two common template-based strategies: (1) affine transformation of the EPI data to an EPI template followed by nonlinear registration to an EPI template (EPInorm) and (2) affine transformation of the EPI data to the anatomic image for a given subject, followed by nonlinear registration of the anatomic data to an anatomic template, which produces a transformation that is applied to the EPI data (T1norm). EPI distortion correction can be used to adjust for geometric distortion of EPI relative to the T1 images. However, in practice, this EPI distortion correction step is often skipped. We compare these template-based strategies empirically in four large datasets. We find that the EPInorm approach consistently shows reduced variability across subjects, especially in the case when distortion correction is not applied. EPInorm also shows lower estimates for coregistration distances among subjects (i.e., within-dataset similarity is higher). Finally, the EPInorm approach shows higher T values in a task-based dataset. Thus, the EPInorm approach appears to amplify the power of the sample compared to the T1norm approach when not using distortion correction (i.e., the EPInorm boosts the effective sample size by 12-25%). In sum, these results argue for the use of EPInorm over the T1norm when no distortion correction is used. Hum Brain Mapp 38:5331-5342, 2017. © 2017 The Authors Human Brain Mapping Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAutistic DisorderBrainBrain MappingChildChild, PreschoolHumansInhibition, PsychologicalMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedMotor ActivityNonlinear DynamicsPainRestYoung Adultcoregistrationecho planar imagefMRIspatial normalization

Identifiers

PMID28745021
PMCPMC5565844
OpenAlexW2738849673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.