Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28745010›Full record

ReviewInternational wound journal2017

The detrimental impact of extracellular bacterial proteases on wound healing.

Sharon Lindsay, Angela Oates, Katie Bourdillon

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International wound journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Silver sulfadiazine in modern dermatology.Dermatology online journal · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Frontiers in medicine · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Polymicrobial interactions betweenbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  19. Mutation ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sharon LindsayResearch & Development Department, Systagenix, Gargrave, UK.
Angela OatesSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Katie BourdillonResearch & Development Department, Systagenix, Gargrave, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9658-0094
TiGenix (Spain) · ESUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In addition to clinical signs of infection (e.g. inflammation, purulence and pain), a microbial count of ≥10

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBacterial InfectionsBacterial ProteinsBiofilmsFemaleHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPeptide HydrolasesVirulenceWound HealingWound InfectionBacterial ProteinsPeptide HydrolasesBacterial proteasePoint-of-care diagnosticVirulence factorWound infection

Identifiers

PMID28745010
PMCPMC7949928
OpenAlexW2738020969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.