Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28744839›Full record

ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2017

Methodology to Produce Specimen-Specific Models of Vertebrae: Application to Different Species.

Fernando Y Zapata-Cornelio, Gavin A Day, Ruth H Coe, Sebastien N F Sikora, Vithanage N Wijayathunga, Sami M Tarsuslugil, Marlène Mengoni, Ruth K Wilcox

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fernando Y Zapata-CornelioSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Medical and Biological Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK. f.y.zapatacornelio@leeds.ac.uk.
Gavin A DaySchool of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Medical and Biological Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Ruth H CoeSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Medical and Biological Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Sebastien N F SikoraSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Medical and Biological Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Vithanage N WijayathungaSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Medical and Biological Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Sami M TarsuslugilSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Medical and Biological Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Marlène MengoniSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Medical and Biological Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Ruth K WilcoxSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Medical and Biological Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/F010575/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/G012172/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/K020757/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/L014823/1European Research Council StG-2012-306615
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Image-based continuum-level finite element models have been used for bones to evaluate fracture risk and the biomechanical effects of diseases and therapies, capturing both the geometry and tissue mechanical properties. Although models of vertebrae of various species have been developed, an inter-species comparison has not yet been investigated. The purpose of this study was to derive species-specific modelling methods and compare the accuracy of image-based finite element models of vertebrae across species. Vertebral specimens were harvested from porcine (N = 12), ovine (N = 13) and bovine (N = 14) spines. The specimens were experimentally loaded to failure and apparent stiffness values were derived. Image-based finite element models were generated reproducing the experimental protocol. A linear relationship between the element grayscale and elastic modulus was calibrated for each species matching in vitro and in silico stiffness values, and validated on independent sets of models. The accuracy of these relationships were compared across species. Experimental stiffness values were significantly different across species and specimen-specific models required species-specific linear relationship between image grayscale and elastic modulus. A good agreement between in vitro and in silico values was achieved for all species, reinforcing the generality of the developed methodology.

Indexed as

Elastic ModulusFinite Element AnalysisModels, BiologicalSpinal FracturesSpineAnimalsCattleSheepSpecies SpecificitySwineWeight-BearingBone elastic modulusFinite element analysisImage-based modelIn silico modelsSensitivity analysis

Identifiers

PMID28744839
PMCPMC5622177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.