ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2017
Methodology to Produce Specimen-Specific Models of Vertebrae: Application to Different Species.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Finite Element Model to Investigate the Stability of Osteochondral Grafts Within a Human Tibiofemoral Joint.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2024Article
- Using inverse finite element analysis to identify spinal tissue behaviour in situ.Methods (San Diego, Calif.) · 2021Article
- Experimental and Computational Comparison of Intervertebral Disc Bulge for Specimen-Specific Model Evaluation Based on Imaging.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Article
- Optimizing computational methods of modeling vertebroplasty in experimentally augmented human lumbar vertebrae.JOR spine · 2020Article
- Measurement of range of motions of L3-L4 healthy spine through offsetting reflective markers and in silico analysis of meshed model.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2019Article
- Methodology to Produce Specimen-Specific Models of Vertebrae: Application to Different Species.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Image-based continuum-level finite element models have been used for bones to evaluate fracture risk and the biomechanical effects of diseases and therapies, capturing both the geometry and tissue mechanical properties. Although models of vertebrae of various species have been developed, an inter-species comparison has not yet been investigated. The purpose of this study was to derive species-specific modelling methods and compare the accuracy of image-based finite element models of vertebrae across species. Vertebral specimens were harvested from porcine (N = 12), ovine (N = 13) and bovine (N = 14) spines. The specimens were experimentally loaded to failure and apparent stiffness values were derived. Image-based finite element models were generated reproducing the experimental protocol. A linear relationship between the element grayscale and elastic modulus was calibrated for each species matching in vitro and in silico stiffness values, and validated on independent sets of models. The accuracy of these relationships were compared across species. Experimental stiffness values were significantly different across species and specimen-specific models required species-specific linear relationship between image grayscale and elastic modulus. A good agreement between in vitro and in silico values was achieved for all species, reinforcing the generality of the developed methodology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.