ArticleProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2018
Isolation and Selection of Potential Probiotic Bacteria from the Pig Gastrointestinal Tract.
Article in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- One Health Investigation of Stage-Dependent Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns Across Intermediate and Ripened Dairy Matrices: The Tyrovolia-Kopanisti Paradigm.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- The Characterization of Lactic Acid Bacteria Strains as Components of a Biopreparation for Chickens for Slaughter.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Bacteriocins: potentials and prospects in health and agrifood systems.Archives of microbiology · 2024Review
- Immunomodulation, Bioavailability and Safety of Bacteriocins.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Probiotics and Postbiotics as an Alternative to Antibiotics: An Emphasis on Pigs.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Comprehensive Approaches for the Search and Characterization of Staphylococcins.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Targeting Enterococci with Antimicrobial Activity againstAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Molecular characterization of gut microbiome in weaning pigs supplemented with multi-strain probiotics using metagenomic, culturomic, and metabolomic approaches.Animal microbiome · 2022Article
- Screening of Bacteria InhibitingMicroorganisms · 2022Article
- Bacteriocins: Properties and potential use as antimicrobials.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2022Review
- Isolation and probiotic potential of lactic acid bacteria from swine feces for feed additive composition.Archives of microbiology · 2021Article
- Probiotics and Postbiotics as Substitutes of Antibiotics in Farm Animals: A Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Review
- Effects of Different Fermented Feeds on Production Performance, Cecal Microorganisms, and Intestinal Immunity of Laying Hens.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
- Impact of Supplementary Microbial Additives Producing Antimicrobial Substances and Digestive Enzymes on Growth Performance, Blood Metabolites, and Fecal Microflora of Weaning Pigs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
- Effects of Lactobacillus salivarius isolated from feces of fast-growing pigs on intestinal microbiota and morphology of suckling piglets.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Isolation, Identification, and Screening of Lactic Acid Bacteria with Probiotic Potential in Silage of Different Species of Forage Plants, Cocoa Beans, and Artisanal Salami.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2021Article
- Dual Inhibition ofMicroorganisms · 2021Article
- Selection of ImmunobioticMicroorganisms · 2020Article
- In Vitro Evaluation of Probiotic Potential of Selected Lactic Acid Bacteria Strains.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2020Article
- Draft Genome Sequence of Ligilactobacillus salivarius FFIG58, Isolated from the Intestinal Tract of Wakame-Fed Pig.Microbiology resource announcements · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study aimed to isolate bacterial strains from the pig gastrointestinal tract that have antagonistic activity against potential pathogens and are able to produce antimicrobial compounds. That ability would be a first requirement for the strains' possible use as probiotics. Samples obtained from pig intestinal mucosa and contents were screened for the presence of antagonistic activity against pathogenic indicator strains of Escherichia coli, Salmonella, and Listeria by means of the double-layer technique. Samples displaying the largest inhibitory halos were further studied for the production of inhibitory substances using the agar diffusion and microtitration methods. The three most promising isolates were identified by sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene and showed highest affiliation to Lactobacillus salivarius. Optimal growth conditions and bacteriocin production were recorded in de Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe broth under anaerobic conditions at 37 °C. The antimicrobial substances were found to be sensitive to proteolytic enzymes but showed good stability at pH values below 6. Our findings suggest that these three intestinal strains are able to produce antimicrobial substances capable of inhibiting the growth of potential enteric pathogens and might have potential as probiotic feed additives for the prevention of gastrointestinal diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.