Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28744756›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2018

Short-term outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the octogenarian population.

Baha John Tadros, John Dabis, Roy Twyman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: is really a good option?Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Comorbidities rather than age affect medium-term outcome in octogenarian patients after total knee arthroplasty.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Baha John TadrosRegistrar in Trauma and Orthopaedics, St Richards Hospital, Western Sussex Hospitals, Spitalfield Lane, Chichester, PO19 6SE, UK.
John DabisSpecialist Registrar (ST8) in Trauma and Orthopaedics, South West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Epsom Hospital, Dorking Road, Epsom, KT18 7EG, UK. johndabis1@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1283-9669
Roy TwymanConsultant Orthopaedic Surgeon, South West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Epsom Hospital, Dorking Road, Epsom, KT18 7EG, UK.
Epsom Hospital · GBSt Richard's Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUnicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) provides significant benefits to patients with anteromedial osteoarthritis, with good long-term results. Morbidity and mortality rates are lower, and recovery is quicker. These benefits would be advantageous to the octogenarian population whom carry significant comorbidities. The primary aim was to compare the short-term functional outcome at 2 years of UKA in the octogenarian population against a stratified younger cohort of patients. We hypothesised that the octogenarian population would have equally significant improved patient-reported outcome measures.

methodsProspective patient-reported outcome measures, including Oxford Knee Score (OKS), satisfaction rates and Euro-Quol (EQ-5D) scores at 1-year and 2-year post-operative data, were collected and analysed. Three hundred and ninety-five medial Oxford Phase 3 UKA implants were evaluated. Mean follow-up was 4.7 years (range 2.1-7.7). Secondary outcomes including revision rates, length of stay, complications and mortality were recorded. Our patient population was stratified into three cohort groups based on age: 60-69, 70-79 and 80-89 years.

resultsThe OKS and EQ-5D score improved significantly in all three groups at all post-operative time periods and maintained at 2 years. The OKS at 2 years post-operatively by age was 39.5 (SD 18.6), 39.2 (SD 17.7) and 39.3 (SD 15.9), respectively. No significant difference of implant survival was found between the groups. The overall revision rate was 28/395 (7%). The 90-day mortality in the present series was one patient.

conclusionThe 2-year short-term functional outcome, revision rates and satisfaction of UKA in the octogenarian population did not differ statistically from other age groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresAgedAged, 80 and overArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKnee ProsthesisMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneeProspective StudiesOctogenarianPatient-reported outcome measureUnicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID28744756
OpenAlexW2739442372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.