ReviewCurrent genetics2018
The evolution of a G1/S transcriptional network in yeasts.
Review in Current genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mathematical analysis of G1/S sub-networks in hematopoietic proliferation: Sequential and lineage-specific activation.iScience · 2026Article
- Article
- Deep learning-driven imaging of cell division and cell growth across an entire eukaryotic life cycle.Molecular biology of the cell · 2025Article
- Exportin Crm1 is important for Swi6 nuclear shuttling and MBF transcription activation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.BMC molecular and cell biology · 2022Article
- Control of Gene Expression via the Yeast CWI Pathway.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Regulation of sphingolipid synthesis by the G1/S transcription factor Swi4.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular and cell biology of lipids · 2021Article
- Coordination of the Cell Wall Integrity and High-Osmolarity Glycerol Pathways in Response to Ethanol Stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2019Article
- Down-regulation of Cdk1 activity in G1 coordinates the G1/S gene expression programme with genome replication.Current genetics · 2019Review
- Regulation of the program of DNA replication by CDK: new findings and perspectives.Current genetics · 2019Review
- Rb analog Whi5 regulates G1 to S transition and cell size but not replicative lifespan in budding yeast.Translational medicine of aging · 2019Article
- Phosphorylation by Prp4 kinase releases the self-inhibition of FgPrp31 in Fusarium graminearum.Current genetics · 2018Article
- Brain lipid-binding protein promotes proliferation and modulates cell cycle in C6 rat glioma cells.International journal of oncology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The G1-to-S cell cycle transition is promoted by the periodic expression of a large set of genes. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae G1/S gene expression is regulated by two transcription factor (TF) complexes, the MBF and SBF, which bind to specific DNA sequences, the MCB and SCB, respectively. Despite extensive research little is known regarding the evolution of the G1/S transcription regulation including the co-evolution of the DNA binding domains with their respective DNA binding sequences. We have recently examined the co-evolution of the G1/S TF specificity through the systematic generation and examination of chimeric Mbp1/Swi4 TFs containing different orthologue DNA binding domains in S. cerevisiae (Hendler et al. in PLoS Genet 13:e1006778. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006778 , 2017). Here, we review the co-evolution of G1/S transcriptional network and discuss the evolutionary dynamics and specificity of the MBF-MCB and SBF-SCB interactions in different fungal species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.