Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28744695›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of urology2017

Update of the ICUD-SIU consultation on stone technology behind ureteroscopy.

Jonathan Cloutier, Ken Anson, Guido Giusti, Michael Grasso, Guido Kamphuis, Sven Lahme, Evangelos Liatsikos, Anup Patel, Margaret S Pearle, Luc Valiquette and 1 more

Abstract readReviewConsensus Statement
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of urology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Intra-renal pressure and temperature during ureteroscopy: Does it matter?International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jonathan CloutierDepartment of Urology, CHU de Québec, Laval University, Quebec, Canada. jonathan.cloutier.2@ulaval.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3369-0162
Ken AnsonDepartment of Urology, St George's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Guido GiustiVille Turro Division, Department of Urology, Ospedale San Raffaele, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Michael GrassoDepartment of Urology, Lenox Hill Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Guido KamphuisDepartment of Urology, AMC University Hospital, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam Z-O, The Netherlands.
Sven LahmeDepartment of Urology, Hospital St. Trudpert, Pforzheim, Germany.
Evangelos LiatsikosDepartment of Urology, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Anup PatelDepartment of Urology, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Margaret S PearleDepartments of Urology and Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Luc ValiquetteDepartment of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Canada.
Olivier TraxerDepartment of Urology, Tenon Hospital, Pierre et Marie Curie University, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUreteroscopy is now the most frequent treatment used around the world for stone disease. Technological advancement, efficiency, safety, and minimally invasiveness of this procedure are some of the reasons for this change of trend. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this review of the literature, a search of the PubMed database was conducted to identify articles related to ureteroscopy and accessories. The committee assigned by the International Consultation on Urological Disease reviewed all the data and produced a consensus statement relating to the ureteroscopy and all the particularities around this procedure.

conclusionThis manuscript provides literatures and recommendations for endourologists to keep them informed in regard to the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative consideration in regard of a ureteroscopy.

Indexed as

StentsUreteroscopesEquipment DesignHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicUreteral CalculiUreteroscopyAntiretropulsion devicesGuidewiresIrrigation devicesRecommendationsSemi-rigid and flexible ureteroscopyUreteral access sheathUreteral stentsUreteroscopy outcomes and complications

Identifiers

PMID28744695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.