Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28744664›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2017

Evaluation of the Carba NP test for carbapenemase detection in Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas spp. and Acinetobacter spp., and its practical use in the routine work of a national reference laboratory for susceptibility testing.

E Literacka, M Herda, A Baraniak, D Żabicka, W Hryniewicz, A Skoczyńska, M Gniadkowski

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Rapid Identification of Carbapenem-ResistantInfection and drug resistance · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Conventional and Real-Time PCR TargetingAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  9. An Application of Imipenem Discs orAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  10. Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Anti-carbapenamase activity ofSaudi journal of biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of carbapenem-resistantAntimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Determinants of Mortality in Patients with NosocomialThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

E LiterackaDepartment of Epidemiology and Clinical Microbiology, National Medicines Institute, ul. Chełmska 30/34, 00-725, Warsaw, Poland. eliteracka@cls.edu.pl.
M HerdaDepartment of Epidemiology and Clinical Microbiology, National Medicines Institute, ul. Chełmska 30/34, 00-725, Warsaw, Poland.
A BaraniakDepartment of Molecular Microbiology, National Medicines Institute, ul. Chełmska 30/34, 00-725, Warsaw, Poland.
D ŻabickaDepartment of Epidemiology and Clinical Microbiology, National Medicines Institute, ul. Chełmska 30/34, 00-725, Warsaw, Poland.
W HryniewiczDepartment of Epidemiology and Clinical Microbiology, National Medicines Institute, ul. Chełmska 30/34, 00-725, Warsaw, Poland.
A SkoczyńskaDepartment of Epidemiology and Clinical Microbiology, National Medicines Institute, ul. Chełmska 30/34, 00-725, Warsaw, Poland.
M GniadkowskiDepartment of Molecular Microbiology, National Medicines Institute, ul. Chełmska 30/34, 00-725, Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the Carba NP test (and CarbAcineto) for the detection of carbapenemases in Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas spp. and Acinetobacter spp., and to assess its usefulness in the routine work of the National Reference Centre for Susceptibility Testing (NRCST) in Poland. The evaluation of the Carba NP/CarbAcineto tests was carried out on a group of 81 Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas spp. and Acinetobacter spp. isolates producing KPC-, NDM-, VIM-, IMP- or OXA-48, -23, -24/40, -58-type carbapenemases, and on 26 carbapenemase-negative strains cultivated on a broad panel of microbiological media. Subsequently, the performance of the Carba NP/CarbAcineto tests was assessed on 1282 isolates of Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas spp. and Acinetobacter spp. from Polish hospitals, submitted to the NRCST during a 9-month period in 2014. The Carba NP/CarbAcineto results were compared with other phenotypic tests and/or polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The impact of the media on the results of the Carba NP/CarbAcineto tests was observed, with the Columbia blood agar yielding the highest sensitivity and clarity of the results. Furthermore, the Carba NP/CarbAcineto tests were included in the NRCST routine procedure for carbapenemase identification. The sensitivity and specificity of the Carba NP test were 95.8% and 93.3%, respectively, for Enterobacteriaceae, and 97.5% and 99.0%, respectively, for Pseudomonas spp. The sensitivity of the CarbAcineto test for Acinetobacter spp. was 88.9%. This study confirmed the usefulness of the Carba NP/CarbAcineto tests for the rapid detection of various types of carbapenemases.

Indexed as

AcinetobacterBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasesDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialEnterobacteriaceaeHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPolymerase Chain ReactionPseudomonasSensitivity and SpecificityBacterial Proteinsbeta-Lactamasescarbapenemase

Identifiers

PMID28744664
PMCPMC5653713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.