Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28744627›Full record

ReviewCurrent psychiatry reports2017

Neurocognitive Treatments for Eating Disorders and Obesity.

Dawn M Eichen, Brittany E Matheson, Sara L Appleton-Knapp, Kerri N Boutelle

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current psychiatry reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Binge eating disorder.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2022
    Article
  19. Obesity and Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dawn M EichenDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr, MC0874, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA. deichen@ucsd.edu.
Brittany E MathesonDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr, MC0874, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.
Sara L Appleton-KnappDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr, MC0874, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.
Kerri N BoutelleDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr, MC0874, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.

Funding

Treatment of obesity targeting appetite and cue reactivityR01DK103554 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BOUTELLE, KERRI N · 2015 to 2019
$3.4M
Learning Theory to Improve Obesity TreatmentsR01DK094475 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BOUTELLE, KERRI N · 2012 to 2016
$3.1M
The treatment of childhood obesityK02HL112042 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BOUTELLE, KERRI N · 2012 to 2014
$321k
NHLBI NIH HHS K02 HL112042NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK094475NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK103554
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewRecent research has highlighted executive function and neurocognitive deficits among individuals with eating and weight disorders, identifying a potential target for treatment. Treatments targeting executive function for eating and weight disorders are emerging. This review aims to summarize the recent literature evaluating neurocognitive/executive function-oriented treatments for eating and weight disorders and highlights additional work needed in this area. RECENT

findingsCognitive remediation therapy (CRT) for anorexia nervosa has been the most extensively studied neurocognitive treatment for eating disorders. Results demonstrate that CRT improves executive function and may aid in the reduction of eating disorder symptomatology. Computer training programs targeting modifying attention and increasing inhibition are targeting reduction of binge eating and weight loss with modest success. Neurocognitive treatments are emerging and show initial promise for eating and weight disorders. Further research is necessary to determine whether these treatments can be used as stand-alone treatments or whether they need to be used as an adjunct to or in conjunction with other evidence-based treatments to improve outcomes.

Indexed as

ObesityCognitive Behavioral TherapyExecutive FunctionFeeding and Eating DisordersHumansMental Status and Dementia TestsTreatment OutcomeEating disordersExecutive functionNeurocognitive treatmentObesity

Identifiers

PMID28744627
PMCPMC5669379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.