ReviewToxicological research2017
Review in Toxicological research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Comprehensive reexamination of the acute toxicity of nitrogen mustards: HN-1, HN-2 and HN-3 as blister agents: application of multi in silico approach.Archives of toxicology · 2025Article
- Molecular similarity in chemical informatics and predictive toxicity modeling: from quantitative read-across (q-RA) to quantitative read-across structure-activity relationship (q-RASAR) with the application of machine learning.Critical reviews in toxicology · 2024Review
- Recent advances and current challenges of new approach methodologies in developmental and adult neurotoxicity testing.Archives of toxicology · 2024Review
- Predicting phase-I metabolism of piceatannol: an in silico study.In silico pharmacology · 2024Article
- Monte Carlo Models for Sub-Chronic Repeated-Dose Toxicity: Systemic and Organ-Specific Toxicity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Article
- COSMOS next generation - A public knowledge base leveraging chemical and biological data to support the regulatory assessment of chemicals.Computational toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2021Article
- Cardiovascular Effects of Polychlorinated Biphenyls and Their Major Metabolites.Environmental health perspectives · 2020Article
- Unlocking the potential ofComputational toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2019Article
- Article
- Benchmark Dose Modeling ofToxicological research · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.