Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28744147›Full record

ArticleOncoTargets and therapy2017

Evaluation of

Haojie Liu, Ming Zhou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in OncoTargets and therapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Locally advanced choroidal melanoma with favorable molecular prognosis - case report.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Haojie LiuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian, China.
Ming ZhouDepartment of Ophthalmology, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian, China.
Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate the correlation between the expression of MATERIALS AND

methodsReal-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test and Western blot were used to detect the expression of p53 in C918, MUM-2B, and D78 cell lines at the levels of messenger RNA (mRNA) and protein. Immunohistochemistry staining was done in the tissues of 68 patients, which were diagnosed with uveal melanoma. Furthermore, the effects of p53 protein on the invasion abilities of both the cell lines were studied by transinfection of p53 small interfering RNA. The clinical and prognostic data regarding the effect of p53 protein on the patient's prognosis were calculated and further analyzed by Kaplan-Meier univariate analysis method.

resultsThe results of RT-PCR and Western blot revealed that p53 mRNAs were highly expressed in C918 and MUM-2B cells. The high expression rate of p53 among the 88 uveal melanoma tissues was 77.27%. Transinfection of p53 serine could inhibit the expression of p53 in uveal melanoma and the invasion ability of the cells. This study found that the high expression of p53 and the prognosis of uveal melanoma patients were statistically correlated.

conclusionThe expression of p53 protein in uveal melanoma was unusual and was associated with the invasion ability of uveal melanoma. This indicates that the highest expression of p53 protein indicates worse prognosis of uveal melanoma patients.

Indexed as

immunohistochemistryPCRprognosisuveal melanomaWestern blot

Identifiers

PMID28744147
PMCPMC5513883
OpenAlexW2736014668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.