Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28744094›Full record

ReviewClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2017

Patient considerations in ocular hypertension: role of bimatoprost ophthalmic solution.

Daniel Lee, Anand V Mantravadi, Jonathan S Myers

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03487042 (Bimatoprost 0.03% Solution, NB-UVB and Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser in Treatment of Generalized Vitiligo), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03487042 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Bimatoprost 0.03% Solution, NB-UVB and Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser in Treatment of Generalized Vitiligo

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2018 to 2019Enrolled40ConditionsGeneralized VitiligoArmsBimatoprost 0.03% ophthalmic solution
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. From Eye Care to Hair Growth: Bimatoprost.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel LeeGlaucoma Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Anand V MantravadiGlaucoma Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Jonathan S MyersGlaucoma Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glaucoma is a leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide. The reduction of intraocular pressure has been well established as an effective treatment to prevent both the development and the progression of all forms of glaucoma. Bimatoprost 0.03% ophthalmic solution, introduced in 2001, is a synthetic prostamide with the unique mechanism of improving both uveoscleral and trabecular outflow. Comparative studies with other pharmacotherapies have shown favorable results for bimatoprost as a potent ocular hypotensive agent that is generally well tolerated. Common side effects include conjunctival hyperemia, eyelash growth, iris pigmentation and periorbital changes. Hyperemia rates were reduced following the introduction of bimatoprost 0.01%. Bimatoprost should be used with caution in those with higher risk of developing ocular inflammation and macular edema. However, the perceived risk of bimatoprost in these patient populations is likely greater than the actual risk observed in practice. Bimatoprost is currently in the center of several clinical trials including its use for dermatologic applications and sustained-release therapies for the treatment of ocular hypertension and glaucoma.

Indexed as

bimatoprostglaucomaocular hypertension

Identifiers

PMID28744094
PMCPMC5513827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.