Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28743987›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Empathy for others' suffering and its mediators in mental health professionals.

Hernando Santamaría-García, Sandra Baez, Adolfo M García, Daniel Flichtentrei, María Prats, Ricardo Mastandueno, Mariano Sigman, Diana Matallana, Marcelo Cetkovich, Agustín Ibáñez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A Brief Online Implicit Bias Intervention for School Mental Health Clinicians.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Trial
  3. 'Traumatic to Say the Least; It Still Affects Me': Consumer Perspectives on Community Treatment Orders in Australia.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Hernando Santamaría-GarcíaCentro de Memoria y Cognición Intellectus, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia.
Sandra BaezGrupo de Investigación Cerebro y Cognición Social, Bogotá, Colombia.
Adolfo M GarcíaLaboratory of Experimental Psychology and Neuroscience (LPEN), Institute of Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience (INCyT), INECO Foundation, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-6936-0114
Daniel FlichtentreiIntramedPortal www.intramed.net, Buenos Aires, CABA, Argentina.
María PratsIntramedPortal www.intramed.net, Buenos Aires, CABA, Argentina.
Ricardo MastanduenoIntramedPortal www.intramed.net, Buenos Aires, CABA, Argentina.
Mariano SigmanUniversidad Torcuato di Tella, Laboratorio de Neurociencias, Buenos, Aires, Argentina.
Diana MatallanaCentro de Memoria y Cognición Intellectus, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia.
Marcelo CetkovichLaboratory of Experimental Psychology and Neuroscience (LPEN), Institute of Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience (INCyT), INECO Foundation, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Agustín IbáñezLaboratory of Experimental Psychology and Neuroscience (LPEN), Institute of Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience (INCyT), INECO Foundation, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina. aibanez@ineco.org.ar.ORCID 0000-0001-6758-5101
Favaloro University · ARAustralian Research Council · AUPontificia Universidad Javeriana · COUniversidad de Los Andes · COUniversidad Nacional de Cuyo · ARUniversidad Torcuato Di Tella · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Empathy is a complex cognitive and affective process that allows humans to experience concern for others, comprehend their emotions, and eventually help them. In addition to studies with healthy subjects and various neuropsychiatric populations, a few reports have examined this domain focusing on mental health workers, whose daily work requires the development of a saliently empathic character. Building on this research line, the present population-based study aimed to (a) assess different dimensions of empathy for pain in mental health workers relative to general-physicians and non-medical workers; and (b) evaluate their relationship with relevant factors, such as moral profile, age, gender, years of experience, and workplace type. Relative to both control groups, mental health workers exhibited higher empathic concern and discomfort for others' suffering, and they favored harsher punishment to harmful actions. Furthermore, this was the only group in which empathy variability was explained by moral judgments, years of experience, and workplace type. Taken together, these results indicate that empathy is continuously at stake in mental health care scenarios, as it can be affected by contextual factors and social contingencies. More generally, they highlight the importance of studying this domain in populations characterized by extreme empathic demands.

Indexed as

EmpathyAdultFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansJudgmentMaleMental HealthMiddle AgedMoralsPain

Identifiers

PMID28743987
PMCPMC5527046
OpenAlexW2739223377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.