Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28743959›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Continual conscious bioluminescent imaging in freely moving somatotransgenic mice.

Rajvinder Karda, Dany P Perocheau, Natalie Suff, Joanne Ng, Juliette M K M Delhove, Suzanne M K Buckley, Samantha Richards, John R Counsell, Henrik Hagberg, Mark R Johnson and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Refinement in the European Union: A Systematic Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Rajvinder KardaGene Transfer Technology Group, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK. r.karda@ucl.ac.uk.
Dany P PerocheauGene Transfer Technology Group, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.
Natalie SuffGene Transfer Technology Group, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.
Joanne NgGene Transfer Technology Group, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.
Juliette M K M DelhoveInstitute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
Suzanne M K BuckleyGene Transfer Technology Group, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.
Samantha RichardsGene Transfer Technology Group, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.
John R CounsellInstitute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9208-101X
Henrik HagbergDepartment of Perinatal Imaging & Health, King's College London, London, UK.
Mark R JohnsonDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Tristan R McKayCentre for Biomedicine, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
Simon N WaddingtonGene Transfer Technology Group, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4970-4730
University College London · GBCancer Research UK · GBImperial College London · GBKing's College London · GBManchester Metropolitan University · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P026494/1National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research NC/L001780/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Luciferase bioimaging in living animals is increasingly being applied in many fields of biomedical research. Rodent imaging usually involves anaesthetising the animal during data capture, however, the biological consequences of anaesthesia have been largely overlooked. We have evaluated luciferase bioimaging in conscious, unrestrained mice after neonatal intracranial or intravascular administration of lentiviral, luciferase reporter cassettes (biosensors); we present real-time analyses from the first day of life to adulthood. Anaesthetics have been shown to exert both neurotoxic and neuroprotective effects during development and in models of brain injury. Mice subjected to bioimaging after neonatal intracranial or intravascular administration of biosensors, targeting the brain and liver retrospectively showed no significant difference in luciferase expression when conscious or unconscious throughout development. We applied conscious bioimaging to the assessment of NFκB and STAT3 transcription factor activated reporters during the earliest stages of development in living, unrestrained pups. Our data showed unique longitudinal activities for NFκB and STAT3 in the brain of conscious mice. Conscious bioimaging was applied to a neonatal mouse model of cerebral palsy (Hypoxic-Ischaemic Encephalopathy). Imaging of NFκB reporter before and after surgery showed a significant increase in luciferase expression, coinciding with secondary energy failure, in lesioned mice compared to controls.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, NewbornBiosensing TechniquesBrainCerebral PalsyConsciousnessDisease Models, AnimalGenetic VectorsInjections, Intra-ArterialLentivirusLiverLuciferasesMiceMice, TransgenicMolecular ImagingNF-kappa BLuciferasesNF-kappa BRecombinant ProteinsStat3 protein, mouseSTAT3 Transcription Factor

Identifiers

PMID28743959
PMCPMC5526882
OpenAlexW2736777322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.