Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28743862›Full record

ArticleNature communications2017

Co-option of the cardiac transcription factor Nkx2.5 during development of the emu wing.

Peter G Farlie, Nadia M Davidson, Naomi L Baker, Mai Raabus, Kelly N Roeszler, Claire Hirst, Andrew Major, Mylene M Mariette, David M Lambert, Alicia Oshlack and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Limb positioning and initiation: An evolutionary context of pattern and formation.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2021
    Review
  9. Longer or shorter spines: Reciprocal trait evolution in stickleback via triallelic regulatory changes inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Evolution of the avian digital pattern.Scientific reports · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Peter G FarlieMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia. peter.farlie@mcri.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8230-4563
Nadia M DavidsonMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Naomi L BakerMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Mai RaabusMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Kelly N RoeszlerMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Claire HirstBiomedicine Discovery Institute, Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia.
Andrew MajorBiomedicine Discovery Institute, Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9036-6652
Mylene M MarietteCentre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, VIC, 3216, Australia.
David M LambertEnvironmental Futures Research Institute, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, 4111, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5821-3637
Alicia OshlackMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9788-5690
Craig A SmithMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Royal Children's Hospital · AUAustralian Regenerative Medicine Institute · AUDeakin University · AUGriffith University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ratites are a distinctive clade of flightless birds, typified by the emu and ostrich that have acquired a range of unique anatomical characteristics since diverging from basal Aves at least 100 million years ago. The emu possesses a vestigial wing with a single digit and greatly reduced forelimb musculature. However, the embryological basis of wing reduction and other anatomical changes associated with loss of flight are unclear. Here we report a previously unknown co-option of the cardiac transcription factor Nkx2.5 to the forelimb in the emu embryo, but not in ostrich, or chicken and zebra finch, which have fully developed wings. Nkx2.5 is expressed in emu limb bud mesenchyme and maturing wing muscle, and mis-expression of Nkx2.5 throughout the limb bud in chick results in wing reductions. We propose that Nkx2.5 functions to inhibit early limb bud expansion and later muscle growth during development of the vestigial emu wing.The transcription factor Nkx2.5 is essential for heart development. Here, the authors identify a previously unknown expression domain for Nkx2.5 in the emu wing and explore its role in diminished wing bud development in the flightless emu, compared with three other birds that have functional wings.

Indexed as

AnimalsAvian ProteinsDromaiidaeForelimbGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHomeobox Protein Nkx-2.5In Situ HybridizationLimb BudsMesodermMuscle, SkeletalMyocardiumReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionTranscription FactorsWings, AnimalAvian ProteinsHomeobox Protein Nkx-2.5Transcription Factors

Identifiers

PMID28743862
PMCPMC5526984
OpenAlexW2738882198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.