ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical sciences2017
Comparative Characterization of Crofelemer Samples Using Data Mining and Machine Learning Approaches With Analytical Stability Data Sets.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chemical Stability of the Botanical Drug Substance Crofelemer: A Model System for Comparative Characterization of Complex Mixture Drugs.Journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2017Article
- The Botanical Drug Substance Crofelemer as a Model System for Comparative Characterization of Complex Mixture Drugs.Journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is growing interest in generating physicochemical and biological analytical data sets to compare complex mixture drugs, for example, products from different manufacturers. In this work, we compare various crofelemer samples prepared from a single lot by filtration with varying molecular weight cutoffs combined with incubation for different times at different temperatures. The 2 preceding articles describe experimental data sets generated from analytical characterization of fractionated and degraded crofelemer samples. In this work, we use data mining techniques such as principal component analysis and mutual information scores to help visualize the data and determine discriminatory regions within these large data sets. The mutual information score identifies chemical signatures that differentiate crofelemer samples. These signatures, in many cases, would likely be missed by traditional data analysis tools. We also found that supervised learning classifiers robustly discriminate samples with around 99% classification accuracy, indicating that mathematical models of these physicochemical data sets are capable of identifying even subtle differences in crofelemer samples. Data mining and machine learning techniques can thus identify fingerprint-type attributes of complex mixture drugs that may be used for comparative characterization of products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.