Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28743306›Full record

ArticleDiagnostic pathology2017

Detection of 22 common leukemic fusion genes using a single-step multiplex qRT-PCR-based assay.

Xiaodong Lyu, Xianwei Wang, Lina Zhang, Zhenzhu Chen, Yu Zhao, Jieying Hu, Ruihua Fan, Yongping Song

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostic pathology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Alternative tumour-specific antigens.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2019
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaodong LyuSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450000, China.
Xianwei WangCentral Laboratory, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University; Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450000, China.
Lina ZhangDepartment of Hematology, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University; Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450000, China.
Zhenzhu ChenDepartment of Hematology, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University; Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450000, China.
Yu ZhaoCentral Laboratory, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University; Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450000, China.
Jieying HuCentral Laboratory, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University; Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450000, China.
Ruihua FanCentral Laboratory, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University; Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450000, China.
Yongping SongDepartment of Hematology, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University; Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450000, China. songyongping@medmail.com.
Henan Cancer Hospital · CNZhengzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFusion genes generated from chromosomal translocation play an important role in hematological malignancies. Detection of fusion genes currently employ use of either conventional RT-PCR methods or fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), where both methods involve tedious methodologies and require prior characterization of chromosomal translocation events as determined by cytogenetic analysis. In this study, we describe a real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR)-based multi-fusion gene screening method with the capacity to detect 22 fusion genes commonly found in leukemia. This method does not require pre-characterization of gene translocation events, thereby facilitating immediate diagnosis and therapeutic management.

methodsWe performed fluorescent qRT-PCR (F-qRT-PCR) using a commercially-available multi-fusion gene detection kit on a patient cohort of 345 individuals comprising 108 cases diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) for initial evaluation; remaining patients within the cohort were assayed for confirmatory diagnosis. Results obtained by F-qRT-PCR were compared alongside patient analysis by cytogenetic characterization.

resultsGene translocations detected by F-qRT-PCR in AML cases were diagnosed in 69.4% of the patient cohort, which was comparatively similar to 68.5% as diagnosed by cytogenetic analysis, thereby demonstrating 99.1% concordance. Overall gene fusion was detected in 53.7% of the overall patient population by F-qRT-PCR, 52.9% by cytogenetic prediction in leukemia, and 9.1% in non-leukemia patients by both methods. The overall concordance rate was calculated to be 99.0%. Fusion genes were detected by F-qRT-PCR in 97.3% of patients with CML, followed by 69.4% with AML, 33.3% with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), 9.1% with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), and 0% with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).

conclusionsWe describe the use of a F-qRT-PCR-based multi-fusion gene screening method as an efficient one-step diagnostic procedure as an effective alternative to lengthy conventional diagnostic procedures requiring both cytogenetic analysis followed by targeted quantitative reverse transcription (qRT-PCR) methods, thus allowing timely patient management.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLeukemiaLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaleMiddle AgedMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionOncogene FusionOncogene Proteins, FusionOncogene Proteins, FusionALLAMLChromosomal rearrangementCLLF-qRT-PCRGene fusionLeukemiaMDS

Identifiers

PMID28743306
PMCPMC5526257
OpenAlexW2737643642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.