Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28743304›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2017

Running on a high: parkrun and personal well-being.

Anne Grunseit, Justin Richards, Dafna Merom

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Sports and Social Interaction: Sports Experiences and Attitudes of the Urban Running Community.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. parkrun: a panacea for health and wellbeing?Journal of research in nursing : JRN · 2021
    Article
  17. Motivation and Behaviour Change inInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A Scoping Review of the Relationship between Running and Mental Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anne GrunseitPrevention Research Collaboration, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Level 6, The Hub, Charles Perkins Centre (D17), Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. anne.grunseit@sydney.edu.au.
Justin RichardsPrevention Research Collaboration, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Level 6, The Hub, Charles Perkins Centre (D17), Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Dafna MeromPhysical Activity and Health, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia.
University of Sydney · AUWestern Sydney University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSporting or physical recreation event participation can affect different domains of mental and social well-being if sufficiently frequent, yet previous research has focused mainly on the physical health benefits of single-location or infrequent mass-participation events. We examined overall and domain specific subjective well-being of adult participants of "parkrun", a weekly, community-based, highly accessible and widespread running event.

methodsData were from a national online survey of 865 adult Australian parkrunners. Scores on nine individual measures and the global Personal Well-being Index (PWI) were compared to national, normative data. Regression models tested associations between personal well-being and perceived benefits of parkrun (mental health and connection to community).

resultsOf 100 scores, 28% of means for parkrunners fell outside overall and age and gender subgroups normative ranges. Satisfaction with health was higher for male, those aged over 45 and overall parkrunners; only parkrunners aged 18-24 fell below their age group norm. Satisfaction with life as a whole was positively associated with perceived mental health benefits of parkrun, but not perceived community connection for women, and neither measure for men. PWI was positively associated with perceived community connection for men and with mental health benefit for women.

conclusionsAustralian parkrunners mostly reflect the general population on personal well-being, except report superior satisfaction with physical health. Women's personal well-being may benefit from parkrun through improved mental health and men's from community connectedness. parkrun may facilitate positive expression of identity and continuation of healthy habits among athletes, and non-demanding, health enhancing activity and social interaction for non-athletes.

Indexed as

Personal SatisfactionAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAustraliaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRunningSex FactorsYoung AdultAgingCommunity eventGenderMental healthPhysical activity

Identifiers

PMID28743304
PMCPMC5526231
OpenAlexW2737616582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.