Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28743261›Full record

Observational studyBMC women's health2017

Frequency and predictors of anxiety and depression among pregnant women attending tertiary healthcare institutes of Quetta City, Pakistan.

Rahila Ghaffar, Qaiser Iqbal, Adnan Khalid, Fahad Saleem, Mohamed Azmi Hassali, Nosheen Sikandar Baloch, Fiaz Ud Din Ahmad, Sajid Bashir, Sajjad Haider, Mohammad Bashaar

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC women's health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Rahila GhaffarFaculty of Pharmacy & Health Sciences, University of Balochistan, Quetta, Pakistan.
Qaiser IqbalFaculty of Pharmacy & Health Sciences, University of Balochistan, Quetta, Pakistan.
Adnan KhalidCombined Military Hospital, Quetta, Pakistan.
Fahad SaleemFaculty of Pharmacy & Health Sciences, University of Balochistan, Quetta, Pakistan.
Mohamed Azmi HassaliSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia.
Nosheen Sikandar BalochGynecology & Obstetric Department, Bolan Medical College Hospital, Quetta, Pakistan.
Fiaz Ud Din AhmadFaculty of Pharmacy & Alternate Medicine, The Islamia University, Bahawalpur, Pakistan.
Sajid BashirFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Sargodha, Punjab, Pakistan.
Sajjad HaiderFaculty of Pharmacy & Health Sciences, University of Balochistan, Quetta, Pakistan.
Mohammad BashaarSMART Afghan International Trainings & Consultancy, Kabul, Afghanistan. dr.mbashaar@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7502-482X
University of Balochistan · PKBolan University of Medical and Health Sciences · PKCombined Military Hospital · PKHealth Protection and Research Organisation · AFIslamia University of Bahawalpur · PKUniversiti Sains Malaysia · MYUniversity of Sargodha · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnxiety and depression (A&D) are commonly reported among pregnant women from all over the world; however, there is a paucity of workable data from the developing countries including Pakistan. The current study, therefore, aims to find out the frequency and predictors of A&D among pregnant women attending a tertiary healthcare institutes in the city of Quetta, in the Balochistan province, Pakistan.

methodsA questionnaire based, cross-sectional survey was conducted. The pre-validated Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) were used to assess the frequency of A&D among study respondents. Anxiety and depression scores were calculated via standard scoring procedures while logistic regression was used to identify the predictors of A&D. SPSS v. 20 was used for data analysis and p < 0.05 was taken as significant.

resultsSeven hundred and fifty pregnant women responded to the survey. The majority of the respondents belonged to age group of 26-35 year (424, 56.4%) and had no formal education (283, 37.6%). Furthermore, 612 (81.4%) of the respondents were unemployed and had urban residencies (651, 86.6%). The mean anxiety score was 10.08 ± 2.52; the mean depression score was 9.51 ± 2.55 and the total HADS score was 19.23 ± 3.91 indicating moderate A&D among the current cohort. Logistic regression analysis reported significant goodness of fit (Chi square = 17.63, p = 0.030, DF = 3), indicating that the model was advisable. Among all variables, age had a significant association when compared with HADS scores [adjusted OR (odds ratios) = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.13-1.62, p < 0.001].

conclusionModerate A&D was reported among the study respondents. Furthermore, age was highlighted as a predictor of A&D. The evidence from this study provides a motion of support programs for anxious and depressed pregnant women. The benefits of implementing good mental health in antenatal care have long-lasting benefits for both mother and infant. Therefore, there is a need to incorporate A&D screening in the existing antenatal programs.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAge FactorsAnxietyCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMiddle AgedOdds RatioPakistanPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnant PeoplePrenatal CareAnxiety and depressionPakistanPredictorsPregnant womenQuetta city

Identifiers

PMID28743261
PMCPMC5526273
OpenAlexW2738191594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.