Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28743252›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2017

Quantification of tumour evolution and heterogeneity via Bayesian epiallele detection.

James E Barrett, Andrew Feber, Javier Herrero, Miljana Tanic, Gareth A Wilson, Charles Swanton, Stephan Beck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A novel workflow for the qualitative analysis of DNA methylation data.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

James E BarrettUCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK. regmjeb@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1274-327X
Andrew FeberUCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK.
Javier HerreroUCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK.
Miljana TanicUCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK.
Gareth A WilsonUCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK.
Charles SwantonUCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK.
Stephan BeckUCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 17786Cancer Research UK 19310Cancer Research UK 20466Medical Research Council FC001169Medical Research Council MR/M025411/1Medical Research Council MR/P014712/1Wellcome Trust FC001169
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEpigenetic heterogeneity within a tumour can play an important role in tumour evolution and the emergence of resistance to treatment. It is increasingly recognised that the study of DNA methylation (DNAm) patterns along the genome - so-called 'epialleles' - offers greater insight into epigenetic dynamics than conventional analyses which examine DNAm marks individually.

resultsWe have developed a Bayesian model to infer which epialleles are present in multiple regions of the same tumour. We apply our method to reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) data from multiple regions of one lung cancer tumour and a matched normal sample. The model borrows information from all tumour regions to leverage greater statistical power. The total number of epialleles, the epiallele DNAm patterns, and a noise hyperparameter are all automatically inferred from the data. Uncertainty as to which epiallele an observed sequencing read originated from is explicitly incorporated by marginalising over the appropriate posterior densities. The degree to which tumour samples are contaminated with normal tissue can be estimated and corrected for. By tracing the distribution of epialleles throughout the tumour we can infer the phylogenetic history of the tumour, identify epialleles that differ between normal and cancer tissue, and define a measure of global epigenetic disorder.

conclusionsDetection and comparison of epialleles within multiple tumour regions enables phylogenetic analyses, identification of differentially expressed epialleles, and provides a measure of epigenetic heterogeneity. R code is available at github.com/james-e-barrett.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAllelesBayes TheoremCpG IslandsDNA MethylationEpigenomicsHumansLung NeoplasmsEpigeneticsHeterogeneityPhylogenetics

Identifiers

PMID28743252
PMCPMC5526259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.