Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28743236›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2017

Assessing the adequacy of lymph node yield for different tumor stages of colon cancer by nodal staging scores.

Zhenyu Wu, Guoyou Qin, Naiqing Zhao, Huixun Jia, Xueying Zheng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Lymph node metastasis in T1-2 colorectal cancer: a population-based study.International journal of colorectal disease · 2023
    Article
  7. Comment on: "Reassessment of the Optimal Number of Examined Lymph Nodes in Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma".Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zhenyu WuDepartment of Biostatistics and Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Guoyou QinDepartment of Biostatistics and Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Naiqing ZhaoDepartment of Biostatistics and Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Huixun JiaCenter for Biomedical Statistics, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Xueying ZhengDepartment of Biostatistics and Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China. xyzheng@fudan.edu.cn.
Fudan University · CNFudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccording to the current official guidelines, at least 12 lymph nodes (LNs) are qualified as an adequate sampling for colon cancer patients. However, patients evaluated with less nodes were still common in the United States, and the prevalence of positive nodal disease may be under-estimated because of the false-negative assessment. In this study, we present a statistical model that allows preoperative determination of the minimum number of lymph nodes needed to confirm a node-negative disease with certain confidence.

methodsAdenocarcinoma colon cancer patients with stage T1-T3, diagnosed between 2004 and 2013, who did not receive neoadjuvant therapies and had at least one lymph node pathologically examined, were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. A beta binomial distribution was used to estimate the probability of an occult nodal disease is truly node-negative as a function of total number of LNs examined and T stage.

resultsA total of 125,306 patients met study criteria; and 47,788 of those were node-positive. The probability of falsely identifying a patient as node-negative decreased with an increasing number of nodes examined for each stage, and was estimated to be 72% for T1 and T2 patients with a single node examined and 57% for T3 patients with a single node examined. To confirm an occult nodal disease with 90% confidence, 3, 8, and 24 nodes need to be examined for patients from stage T1, T2, and T3, respectively.

conclusionsThe false-negative rate of diagnosed node negative, together with the minimum number of examined nodes for adequate staging, depend preoperatively on the clinical T stage. Predictive tools can recommend a threshold on the minimum number of examined nodes regarding to the favored level of confidence for each T stage.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalAdenocarcinomaColonic NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMaleNeoplasm StagingColon cancerFalse-negative rateLymph nodeTumor stage

Identifiers

PMID28743236
PMCPMC5526283
OpenAlexW2738715406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.