ArticleBMC cancer2017
Assessing the adequacy of lymph node yield for different tumor stages of colon cancer by nodal staging scores.
Article in BMC cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic value of lymph node ratio after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Identification of predictors for lymph node metastasis in T2 colorectal cancer: retrospective cohort study from a high-volume hospital.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Defining Optimal Lymph Node Yield in Gastrectomy: A Real-World Cohort Analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Diagnostic accuracy and reliability of CT-based Node-RADS for colon cancer.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- Article
- Lymph node metastasis in T1-2 colorectal cancer: a population-based study.International journal of colorectal disease · 2023Article
- Comment on: "Reassessment of the Optimal Number of Examined Lymph Nodes in Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma".Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2023Article
- Pathologic node-negative lung cancer: Adequacy of lymph node yield and a tool to assess the risk of occult nodal disease.Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022Article
- Pathological Nodal Staging Score for Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma: A Clinical Tool of Adequate Nodal Staging.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The adequacy of lymph node clearance in colon cancer surgery performed in a non-specialist centre; implications for practice.Irish journal of medical science · 2020Article
- Accuracy of nodal staging is influenced by sidedness in colon cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2019Article
- Young age increases the risk for lymph node metastasis in patients with early Colon Cancer.BMC cancer · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccording to the current official guidelines, at least 12 lymph nodes (LNs) are qualified as an adequate sampling for colon cancer patients. However, patients evaluated with less nodes were still common in the United States, and the prevalence of positive nodal disease may be under-estimated because of the false-negative assessment. In this study, we present a statistical model that allows preoperative determination of the minimum number of lymph nodes needed to confirm a node-negative disease with certain confidence.
methodsAdenocarcinoma colon cancer patients with stage T1-T3, diagnosed between 2004 and 2013, who did not receive neoadjuvant therapies and had at least one lymph node pathologically examined, were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. A beta binomial distribution was used to estimate the probability of an occult nodal disease is truly node-negative as a function of total number of LNs examined and T stage.
resultsA total of 125,306 patients met study criteria; and 47,788 of those were node-positive. The probability of falsely identifying a patient as node-negative decreased with an increasing number of nodes examined for each stage, and was estimated to be 72% for T1 and T2 patients with a single node examined and 57% for T3 patients with a single node examined. To confirm an occult nodal disease with 90% confidence, 3, 8, and 24 nodes need to be examined for patients from stage T1, T2, and T3, respectively.
conclusionsThe false-negative rate of diagnosed node negative, together with the minimum number of examined nodes for adequate staging, depend preoperatively on the clinical T stage. Predictive tools can recommend a threshold on the minimum number of examined nodes regarding to the favored level of confidence for each T stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.