Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28743165›Full record

ArticleCancer2017

Prognostic factors and survival outcomes in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in blast phase in the tyrosine kinase inhibitor era: Cohort study of 477 patients.

Preetesh Jain, Hagop M Kantarjian, Ahmad Ghorab, Koji Sasaki, Elias J Jabbour, Graciela Nogueras Gonzalez, Rashmi Kanagal-Shamanna, Ghayas C Issa, Guillermo Garcia-Manero, Devendra Kc and 12 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed, 164 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. [How I treat pediatric chronic myeloid leukemia].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Preetesh JainDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2735-168X
Hagop M KantarjianDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Ahmad GhorabDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Koji SasakiDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9140-0610
Elias J JabbourDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Graciela Nogueras GonzalezDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Rashmi Kanagal-ShamannaDepartment of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7829-5249
Ghayas C IssaDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Guillermo Garcia-ManeroDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Devendra KcDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Sara DellasalaDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Sherry PierceDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Marina KonoplevaDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
William G WierdaDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Srdan VerstovsekDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Naval G DaverDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7103-373X
Tapan M KadiaDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9892-9832
Gautam BorthakurDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Susan O'BrienDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3386-6540
Zeev EstrovDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Farhad RavandiDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Jorge E CortesDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
TOLERANCE INDUCTION BY MEGADOSE STEM CELL TRANSPLANTS IN CML--GVHD AND GVLP01CA049639 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI SHPALL, ELIZABETH J · 1990 to 2014
$41.8M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA049639NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOutcomes in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in blast phase (CML-BP) are historically dismal. Herein, the authors sought to analyze the characteristics, prognostic factors, and survival outcomes in patients with CML-BP in the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) era.

methodsA total of 477 patients with CML-BP were treated with a TKI at some point during the course of their CML. Cox proportional hazard models identified characteristics that were predictive of survival. Overall survival and failure-free survival were assessed. Optimal cutoff points for specific parameters were identified using classification and regression tree (CART) analysis.

resultsThe median age of the patients was 53 years (range, 16-84 years) and 64% were male. Approximately 80% of patients initially were diagnosed in the chronic phase of CML at a median of 41 months (range, 0.7-298 months) before transformation to CML-BP. De novo CML-BP occurred in 71 patients. Approximately 72% of patients received TKI therapy before CML-BP. The initial therapy for CML-BP included a TKI alone (35%), a TKI with chemotherapy (46%), and non-TKI therapies (19%). The median overall survival was 12 months and the median failure-free survival was 5 months. In multivariate analysis, myeloid immunophenotype, prior TKI, age ≥58 years, lactate dehydrogenase level ≥1227 IU/L, platelet count < 102 K/μL, no history of stem cell transplantation, transition to BP from chronic phase/accelerated phase, and the presence of chromosome 15 aberrations predicted for a significantly increased risk of death. Achievement of major hematologic response and/or complete cytogenetic response to first-line treatment was found to be predictive of better survival. The combination of a TKI with intensive chemotherapy followed by stem cell transplantation appeared to confer the best outcome.

conclusionsPatients with CML-BP continue to pose a therapeutic challenge, have dismal outcomes, and require newer treatment approaches. Cancer 2017;123:4391-402. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBlast CrisisCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLeukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL PositiveMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein-Tyrosine KinasesRisk FactorsSurvival AnalysisProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein-Tyrosine Kinasesblast phase (BP)bosutinibchronic myeloid leukemia (CML)dasatinibimatinibnilotinibponatinibtyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI)

Identifiers

PMID28743165
PMCPMC5673547
OpenAlexW2737594272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.