Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28742854›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2017

Risk of exposure to potential vector mosquitoes for rural workers in Northern Lao PDR.

Julie-Anne A Tangena, Phoutmany Thammavong, Steve W Lindsay, Paul T Brey

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Mapping landscape changes to address dengue fever risk in Laos and Thailand.Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Narrative Review on Health-EDRM Primary Prevention Measures for Vector-Borne Diseases.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Julie-Anne A TangenaDepartment of Medical Entomology & Biology of Disease Vectors, Institut Pasteur du Laos, Vientiane, Lao PDR.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8188-4498
Phoutmany ThammavongDepartment of Medical Entomology & Biology of Disease Vectors, Institut Pasteur du Laos, Vientiane, Lao PDR.
Steve W LindsaySchool of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom.
Paul T BreyDepartment of Medical Entomology & Biology of Disease Vectors, Institut Pasteur du Laos, Vientiane, Lao PDR.
Durham University · GBLao-Oxford-Mahosot Hospital-Wellcome Trust Research Unit · LA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne major consequence of economic development in South-East Asia has been a rapid expansion of rubber plantations, in which outbreaks of dengue and malaria have occurred. Here we explored the difference in risk of exposure to potential dengue, Japanese encephalitis (JE), and malaria vectors between rubber workers and those engaged in traditional forest activities in northern Laos PDR. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsAdult mosquitoes were collected for nine months in secondary forests, mature and immature rubber plantations, and villages. Human behavior data were collected using rapid participatory rural appraisals and surveys. Exposure risk was assessed by combining vector and human behavior and calculating the basic reproduction number (R0) in different typologies. Compared to those that stayed in the village, the risk of dengue vector exposure was higher for those that visited the secondary forests during the day (odds ratio (OR) 36.0), for those living and working in rubber plantations (OR 16.2) and for those that tapped rubber (OR 3.2). Exposure to JE vectors was also higher in the forest (OR 1.4) and, similar when working (OR 1.0) and living in the plantations (OR 0.8). Exposure to malaria vectors was greater in the forest (OR 1.3), similar when working in the plantations (OR 0.9) and lower when living in the plantations (OR 0.6). R0 for dengue was >2.8 for all habitats surveyed, except villages where R0≤0.06. The main malaria vector in all habitats was Anopheles maculatus s.l. in the rainy season and An. minimus s.l. in the dry season. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The highest risk of exposure to vector mosquitoes occurred when people visit natural forests. However, since rubber workers spend long periods in the rubber plantations, their risk of exposure is increased greatly compared to those who temporarily enter natural forests or remain in the village. This study highlights the necessity of broadening mosquito control to include rubber plantations.

Indexed as

Environmental ExposureOccupational ExposureAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsBasic Reproduction NumberChildChild, PreschoolDengueEncephalitis, JapaneseFemaleHumansInfantLaos

Identifiers

PMID28742854
PMCPMC5544251
OpenAlexW2738984294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.