Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28742836›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

The impact of MET, IGF-1, IGF1R expression and EGFR mutations on survival of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.

Samer Al-Saad, Elin Richardsen, Thomas K Kilvaer, Tom Donnem, Sigve Andersen, Mehrdad Khanehkenari, Roy M Bremnes, Lill-Tove Busund

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. NAR cancer · 2022
    Article
  6. Antitumor activity of a lectibody targeting cancer-associated high-mannose glycans.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Samer Al-SaadInstitute of Medical Biology, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3707-9667
Elin RichardsenInstitute of Medical Biology, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, Norway.
Thomas K KilvaerInstitute of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, Norway.
Tom DonnemInstitute of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, Norway.
Sigve AndersenInstitute of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, Norway.
Mehrdad KhanehkenariInstitute of Medical Biology, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, Norway.
Roy M BremnesInstitute of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, Norway.
Lill-Tove BusundInstitute of Medical Biology, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, Norway.
University Hospital of North Norway · NOUiT The Arctic University of Norway · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo compare the efficacy of silver in situ hybridization (SISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) in detecting MET and IGF1R alterations and to investigate their prevalence and prognostic significance. A possible correlation between MET receptor expression, MET gene alterations and the two most frequent occurring EGFR gene mutations was also investigated. MATERIALS AND

methodsStage I to IIIA tumors from 326 patients with NSCLC were immunohistochemically tested for protein expression of MET and IGF-1. Their cytoplasmic expression was compared with the gene copy number of the MET and IGF1Rgenes by SISH in paraffin-embedded, formalin-fixed material. Correlations were made with the immunohistochemical expression of two frequent EGFR mutations and clinicopathological variables. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses was used to evaluate the prognostic efficacy of the tested markers.

resultsIn univariate analyses, high cytoplasmic MET expression showed a significant negative prognostic effect in adenocarcinoma patients (p = 0.026). MET gene to chromosome 7 ratio was a significant positive prognostic marker (p = 0.005), probably only due to the highly negative prognostic significance of chromosome 7 polysomy (p = 0.002). High IGF1R gene copy number was a negative prognostic marker for all NSCLC patients (p = 0.037). In the multivariate analysis, polysomy of chromosome 7 in tumor cells correlated significantly and independently with a poor prognosis (p = 0.011). In patients with adenocarcinoma, a high cytoplasmic MET expression was an independent negative prognostic marker (p = 0.013). In males a high IGF1R gene copy number to chromosome 15 count ratio was significantly and independently correlated to a poor prognosis (p = 0.018).

conclusionMET protein expression provides superior prognostic information compared with SISH. Polysomy of chromosome 7 is an independent negative prognostic factor in NSCLC patients. This finding has an important implication while examining genes located on chromosome 7 by means of SISH. High IGF1R gene copy number to chromosome 15 count ratio is an independent predictor of inferior survival in male patients with primary NSCLC.

Indexed as

AgedCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungChromosomes, Human, Pair 7ErbB ReceptorsFemaleGene DosageGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansImmunohistochemistryInsulin-Like Growth Factor ILungLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMutationPrognosisEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsIGF1R protein, humanInsulin-Like Growth Factor IMET protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins c-metReceptor, IGF Type 1Receptors, Somatomedin

Identifiers

PMID28742836
PMCPMC5526580
OpenAlexW2737371788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.