Observational studyPLoS medicine2017
Temporal profile of intracranial pressure and cerebrovascular reactivity in severe traumatic brain injury and association with fatal outcome: An observational study.
Observational study in PLoS medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Clinical outcomes following early versus late pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis in patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2020Pooled it
- Prognostic Value of Cerebrovascular Reactivity (PRx) Versus Intracranial Pressure (ICP) Monitoring in Traumatic Brain Injury: Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Temporal dynamics of ICP, PRx, CPP, and CPPopt in relation to functional outcome in spontaneous cerebellar hemorrhage.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Article
- A novel algorithm for the continuous determination of individualized intracranial pressure (iICP) thresholds using a multi-window weighted approach.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Ups and downs of cerebral autoregulation in the intensive care unit: why should we care?Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
- Early Autonomic Dysfunction Following Severe TBI and Impact on Cerebral Hemodynamics: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Bridging the methodological gap in multitrauma literature: a competency-based educational framework and clinical appraisal filter.Turkish journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- A Comprehensive Review of Fluid Resuscitation Strategies in Traumatic Brain Injury.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Semantic Memory, Traumatic Brain Injury, and the Iceberg Effect: What Deficits May Lie Below the Surface?American journal of speech-language pathology · 2025Review
- Continuous personalized cerebrovascular reactivity-based physiologic metrics in neurocritical care: a narrative review of the current landscape, limitations, and future directions.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Review
- Individualized autoregulation-guided arterial blood pressure management in neurocritical care.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025Review
- Should Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury with Significant Contusions be Treated with Different Neurointensive Care Targets?Neurocritical care · 2024Observational
- The association of acute and chronic phase cerebrovascular reactivity with patient reported quality of life following moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Prognostic value of near-infrared spectroscopy regional oxygen saturation and cerebrovascular reactivity index in acute traumatic neural injury: a CAnadian High-Resolution Traumatic Brain Injury (CAHR-TBI) Cohort Study.Critical care (London, England) · 2024Article
- Non-Invasive Estimation of Intracranial Pressure-Derived Cerebrovascular Reactivity Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Sensor Technology in Acute Neural Injury: A Time-Series Analysis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The crisis of the third day in intracranial pressure dynamics following traumatic brain injury, fact or fiction?Brain & spine · 2024Article
- Associations between intracranial pressure thresholds and multimodal monitoring in acute traumatic neural injury: a scoping review.Acta neurochirurgica · 2023Article
- Association between temporal patterns of baroreflex sensitivity after traumatic brain injury and prognosis: a preliminary study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023Article
- Association between cerebrovascular reactivity in adult traumatic brain injury and improvement in patient outcome over time: an exploratory analysis.Acta neurochirurgica · 2022Article
- Optimal bispectral index level of sedation and cerebral oximetry in traumatic brain injury: a non-invasive individualized approach in critical care?Intensive care medicine experimental · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBoth intracranial pressure (ICP) and the cerebrovascular pressure reactivity represent the dysregulation of pathways directly involved in traumatic brain injury (TBI) pathogenesis and have been used to inform clinical management. However, how these parameters evolve over time following injury and whether this evolution has any prognostic importance have not been studied. METHODS AND
findingsWe analysed the temporal profile of ICP and pressure reactivity index (PRx), examined their relation to TBI-specific mortality, and determined if the prognostic relevance of these parameters was affected by their temporal profile using mixed models for repeated measures of ICP and PRx for the first 240 hours from the time of injury. A total of 601 adults with TBI, admitted between September 2002 to January 2016, and with high-resolution continuous monitoring from a single centre, were studied. At 6 months postinjury, 133 (19%) patients had a fatal outcome; of those, 88 (78%) died from nonsurvivable TBI or brain death. The difference in mean ICP between those with a fatal outcome and functional survivors was only significant for the first 168 hours after injury (all p < 0.05). For PRx, those patients with a fatal outcome also had a higher (more impaired) PRx throughout the first 120 hours after injury (all p < 0.05). The separation of ICP and PRx was greatest in the first 72 hours after injury. Mixed models demonstrated that the explanatory power of the PRx decreases over time; therefore, the prognostic weight assigned to PRx should similarly decrease. However, the ability of ICP to predict a fatal outcome remained relatively stable over time. As control of ICP is the central purpose of TBI management, it is likely that some of the information that is reflected in the natural history of ICP changes is no longer apparent because of therapeutic intervention.
conclusionsWe demonstrated the temporal evolution of ICP and PRx and their relationship with fatal outcome, indicating a potential early prognostic and therapeutic window. The combination of dynamic monitoring variables and their time profile improved prediction of outcome. Therefore, time-driven dynamic modelling of outcome in patients with severe TBI may allow for more accurate and clinically useful prediction models. Further research is needed to confirm and expand on these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.