Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28742699›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery2017

Understanding and Resetting Radiation Sensitivity in Rectal Cancer.

Katherine A Kelley, Rebecca A Ruhl, Shushan R Rana, Elizabeth Dewey, Cristina Espinosa, Charles R Thomas, Robert G Martindale, Sudarshan Anand, Vassiliki L Tsikitis

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. PITPNC1 Suppress CD8Journal of translational medicine · 2024
    Article
  4. The Roles of Non-Coding RNAs in Radiotherapy of Gastrointestinal Carcinoma.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. M6A "Writer" GeneFrontiers in oncology · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katherine A Kelley*Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR †Department of Radiation Oncology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR ‡Department of Cell, Developmental, and Cancer Biology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
Rebecca A Ruhl
Shushan R Rana
Elizabeth Dewey
Cristina Espinosa
Charles R Thomas
Robert G Martindale
Sudarshan Anand
Vassiliki L Tsikitis
Oregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

A microRNA-target Network in Endothelial DNA Damage and AngiogenesisR01HL137779 · NHLBI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI ANAND, SUDARSHAN · 2018 to 2021
$1.5M
MicroRNA regulation of endothelial DNA repair to enhance anti-tumor immunityR01HL143803 · NHLBI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI ANAND, SUDARSHAN · 2018 to 2021
$1.5M
MicroRNA Regulation Of Cell Survival In Angiogenesis & Vessel MaturationR00HL112962 · NHLBI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI ANAND, SUDARSHAN · 2014 to 2016
$733k
NHLBI NIH HHS R00 HL112962NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL137779NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL143803
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of the study was to explore specific microRNAs (miRs) in rectal cancer that would predict response to radiation and identify target pathways that may be exploited for neoadjuvant therapies. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) response is a predictor of survival in rectal cancer. Studies have demonstrated changes in RNA expression correlate with chemoradiation sensitivity across cancers.

methodsForty-five rectal cancer patients, partial responders (PR = 18), nonresponders (NR = 13), and complete responders (CR = 14) to CRT, as defined by a tumor regression score, were examined. miRs differentially expressed, using NanoString microArray profiling, were validated with qPCR. We quantified 1 miR and its downstream targets in patient samples. Chemosensitivity was measured in HCT-116, a human colorectal carcinoma cell line, using inhibitors of SHP2 and RAF.

resultsmiR-451a, 502-5p, 223-3p, and 1246 were the most upregulated miRs (>1.5-fold change) in a NanoString profiling miR panel. qPCR revealed a decrease in expression of miR-451a in NRs. EMSY and CAB39, both downstream targets of miR-451a and involved in carcinogenesis (shown in TCGA) were increased in NRs (qPCR). Both targets are associated with worse survival in colorectal cancer. Inhibition of miR-451a in HCT-116 cells significantly decreased cell proliferation with treatment of SHP2 and RAF inhibitors.

conclusionsAn integrated analysis of rectal cancer miRs may yield biomarkers of radioresistance and offer treatment targets for resensitization.

Indexed as

ChemoradiotherapyGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticRadiation ToleranceFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHCT116 CellsHumansMaleMicroRNAsMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyRectal NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesMicroRNAs

Identifiers

PMID28742699
PMCPMC7289057
OpenAlexW2736312781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.