Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28742481›Full record

ReviewScience progress2016

The interplay between DNA topology and accessory factors in site-specific recombination in bacteria and their bacteriophages.

Charles J Dorman, Marina M Bogue

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Science progress, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Archaeal tyrosine recombinases.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2021
    Review
  4. Review
  5. When is a transcription factor a NAP?Current opinion in microbiology · 2020
    Review
  6. Pervasive Suicidal Integrases in Deep-Sea Archaea.Molecular biology and evolution · 2020
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Charles J Dorman
Marina M Bogue

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Site-specific recombination is employed widely in bacteria and bacteriophage as a basis for genetic switching events that control phenotypic variation. It plays a vital role in the life cycles of phages and in the replication cycles of chromosomes and plasmids in bacteria. Site-specific recombinases drive these processes using very short segments of identical (or nearly identical) DNA sequences. In some cases, the efficiencies of the recombination reactions are modulated by the topological state of the participating DNA sequences and by the availability of accessory proteins that shape the DNA. These dependencies link the molecular machines that conduct the recombination reactions to the physiological state of the cell. This is because the topological state of bacterial DNA varies constantly during the growth cycle and so does the availability of the accessory factors. In addition, some accessory factors are under allosteric control by metabolic products or second messengers that report the physiological status of the cell. The interplay between DNA topology, accessory factors and site-specific recombination provides a powerful illustration of the connectedness and integration of molecular events in bacterial cells and in viruses that parasitise bacterial cells.

Indexed as

Recombination, GeneticBacterial Physiological PhenomenaBacteriophagesBase SequenceDNA, BacterialDNA, SuperhelicalEscherichia coliIntegrasesModels, GeneticNucleic Acid ConformationPhenotypePlasmidsRecombinasesDNA, BacterialDNA, SuperhelicalIntegrasesRecombinases

Identifiers

PMID28742481
PMCPMC10365484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.