Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28742010›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology (Reading, England)2017

Bacterial communities in the small intestine respond differently to those in the caecum and colon in mice fed low- and high-fat diets.

Janet C Onishi, Sara Campbell, Michael Moreau, Falshruti Patel, Andrew I Brooks, Yin Xiu Zhou, Max M Häggblom, Judith Storch

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology (Reading, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Characteristics of the gut microbiome profile in obese patients with colorectal cancer.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Janet C OnishiDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.
Sara CampbellDepartment of Kinesiology and Health, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.
Michael MoreauRUCDR Infinite Biologics, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Falshruti PatelRUCDR Infinite Biologics, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Andrew I BrooksRUCDR Infinite Biologics, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Yin Xiu ZhouDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.
Max M HäggblomDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.
Judith StorchDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

Translational Research Support CoreP30ES005022 · NIEHS · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI PANOS G. GEORGOPOULOS · 1988 to 2026
$47.4M
Supplement to DK-38389 Lipid Transport in the IntestineR01DK038389 · NIDDK · RUTGERS THE ST UNIV OF NJ NEW BRUNSWICK · PI SAMPATH, HARINI, STORCH, JUDITH · 1992 to 2025
$8.6M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK038389NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES005022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial communities in the mouse caecum and faeces are known to be altered by changes in dietary fat. The microbiota of the mouse small intestine, by contrast, has not been extensively profiled and it is unclear whether small intestinal bacterial communities shift with dietary fat levels. We compared the microbiota in the small intestine, caecum and colon in mice fed a low-fat (LF) or high-fat (HF) diet using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The relative abundance of major phyla in the small intestine, Bacteriodetes, Firmicutes and Proteobacteria, was similar to that in the caecum and colon; the relative abundance of Verrucomicrobia was significantly reduced in the small intestine compared to the large intestine. Several genera were uniquely detected in the small intestine and included the aerotolerant anaerobe, Lactobacillus spp. The most abundant genera in the small intestine were accounted for by anaerobic bacteria and were identical to those identified in the large intestine. An HF diet was associated with significant weight gain and adiposity and with changes in the bacterial communities throughout the intestine, with changes in the small intestine differing from those in the caecum and colon. Prominent Gram-negative bacteria including genera of the phylum Bacteroidetes and a genus of Proteobacteria significantly changed in the large intestine. The mechanistic links between these changes and the development of obesity, perhaps involving metabolic endotoxemia, remain to be determined.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsBacteriaBiodiversityCecumColonDiet, High-FatDNA, BacterialHumansIntestine, SmallMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLObesityRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID28742010
PMCPMC5775896
OpenAlexW2737726841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.