Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28741622›Full record

Trial reportNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2018

In Vivo Detection of CPP-115 Target Engagement in Human Brain.

Andrew P Prescot, Steven R Miller, Gary Ingenito, Rebekah S Huber, Douglas G Kondo, Perry F Renshaw

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew P PrescotDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Steven R MillerCatalyst Pharmaceuticals, Coral Gables, FL, USA.
Gary IngenitoCatalyst Pharmaceuticals, Coral Gables, FL, USA.
Rebekah S HuberDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Douglas G KondoDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Perry F RenshawDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
University of Utah · USCatalyst Pharmaceuticals (United States) · US

Funding

MENTORING IN DRUG ABUSE NEUROIMAGINGK24DA015116 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI RENSHAW, PERRY FRANKLIN · 2002 to 2010
$1.3M
NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA015116
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CPP-115, a next-generation γ-amino butyric acid (GABA)-aminotransferase (AT) inhibitor, shows comparable pharmacokinetics, improved safety and tolerability, and a more favorable toxicity profile when compared with vigabatrin. The pharmacodynamic characteristics of CPP-115 remain to be evaluated. The present study employed state-of-the-art proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy techniques to measure changes in brain GABA+ (the composite resonance of GABA, homocarnosine, and macromolecules) concentrations in healthy subjects receiving oral daily doses of CPP-115 or placebo. Six healthy adult males were randomized to receive either single daily 80 mg doses of CPP-115 (n=4) or placebo (n=2) for 6, 10, or 14 days. Metabolite-edited spectra and two-dimensional J-resolved spectroscopy data were acquired from the parietal-occipital cortex and supplementary motor area in all subjects. Four scans were performed in each subject that included a predrug baseline measure, two scans during the dosing timeframe, and a final scan that occurred 1 week after drug cessation. CPP-115 induced robust and significant increases in brain GABA+ concentrations that ranged between 52 and 141% higher than baseline values. Elevated GABA+ concentrations returned to baseline values following drug clearance. Subjects receiving placebo showed no significant changes in GABA+ concentration. CPP-115-induced changes were exclusive to GABA and homocarnosine, and CPP-115 afforded brain GABA+ concentration changes comparable to or greater than previous vigabatrin spectroscopy studies in healthy epilepsy-naive subjects. The return to baseline GABA+ concentration indicates the reversible GABA-AT resynthesis following drug washout. These preliminary data warrant further spectroscopy studies that characterize the acute pharmacodynamic effects of CPP-115 with additional dose-descending measures.

Indexed as

4-Aminobutyrate TransaminaseAdultCerebral CortexDouble-Blind MethodEnzyme InhibitorsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleProlineProton Magnetic Resonance SpectroscopyTime Factors(1S,3S)-3-amino-4-difluoromethylenecyclopentanecarboxylic acid4-Aminobutyrate TransaminaseEnzyme InhibitorsProline

Identifiers

PMID28741622
PMCPMC5770752
OpenAlexW2737782285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.