Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28741503›Full record

ReviewTrends in cancer2016

The 'Pushmi-Pullyu' of DNA REPAIR: Clinical Synthetic Lethality.

S Percy Ivy, Johann de Bono, Elise C Kohn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Ovarian cancer.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Targeting DNA Damage Response in Prostate and Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. TheClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2017
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

S Percy IvyCancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Room 5W458, MSC 9739, Bethesda, MD 20852, USA. Electronic address: ivyp@ctep.nci.nih.gov.
Johann de BonoICR, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sycamore House, Downs Road, Sutton, SM2 5PT, UK.
Elise C KohnCancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Room 5W458, MSC 9739, Bethesda, MD 20852, USA.

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maintenance of genomic integrity is critical for adaptive survival in the face of endogenous and exogenous environmental stress. The loss of stability and fidelity in the genome caused by cancer and cancer treatment provides therapeutic opportunities to leverage the critical balance between DNA injury and repair. Blocking repair and pushing damaged DNA through the cell cycle using therapeutic inhibitors exemplify the 'pushmi-pullyu' effect of disrupted DNA repair. DNA repair inhibitors (DNARi) can be separated into five biofunctional categories: sensors, mediators, transducers, effectors, and collaborators that recognize DNA damage, propagate injury DNA messages, regulate cell cycle checkpoints, and alter the microenvironment. The result is cancer therapeutics that takes advantage of clinical synthetic lethality, resulting in selective tumor cell kill. Here, we review recent considerations related to DNA repair and new DNARi agents and organize those findings to address future directions and clinical opportunities.

Indexed as

Synthetic Lethal MutationsAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsDNA DamageDNA RepairHumansAntineoplastic AgentsDNA damage repairDNA damage responsegenomic instabilityhomologous recombination defectsmutational burdensynthetic lethality

Identifiers

PMID28741503
PMCPMC5527674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.