Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28741423›Full record

ArticleJournal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England)2017

Cognitive control in young adults with cannabis use disorder: An event-related brain potential study.

David Lr Maij, Ben Jm van de Wetering, Ingmar Ha Franken

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Aberrant inhibitory processing in the somatosensory cortices of cannabis-users.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2021
    Article
  8. Which came first: Cannabis use or deficits in impulse control?Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Distress intolerance moderation of neurophysiological markers of response inhibition after induced stress: Relations with cannabis use disorder.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Interaction of sex and cannabis in adultBrain and neuroscience advances
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

David Lr Maij1 Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Ben Jm van de Wetering2 Antes Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Ingmar Ha Franken3 Department of Psychology, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Antes · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contemporary models of substance use disorders emphasize the role of cognitive control, which has been linked to difficulties in resisting the use of substances. In the present study, we measured two aspects of cognitive control, response inhibition (operationalized by a Go/NoGo Task) and performance monitoring (operationalized by an Eriksen Flanker Task), in a group of young cannabis-use disorder (CUD) patients and compared these functions with two control groups (i.e. a group of cigarette smokers and a group of non-smokers). We employed both behavioural and electrophysiological measures. The results indicate that CUD patients displayed reduced NoGo-P3 event-related potentials compared with non-smoking controls, but not compared with smoking controls. In addition, CUD patients were slower on Go trials than both control groups. No other between-group electrophysiological or behavioural differences were observed. These results seem to suggest that CUD patients have problems related to response inhibition, but performance monitoring seems relatively unaffected.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBrainCase-Control StudiesCognitionEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansInhibition, PsychologicalMaleMarijuana AbuseNeuropsychological TestsPsychomotor PerformanceSmokersSmokingYoung AdultCannabisERNN2P3Peperformance monitoringresponse inhibitionsmokers

Identifiers

PMID28741423
PMCPMC5544122
OpenAlexW2737506020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.