Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28741256›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2018

Measuring Work Ability with Its Antecedents: Evaluation of the Work Ability Survey.

Jan-Bennet Voltmer, Jürgen Deller

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Psychometric Properties of the Work Ability Index in Health Centre Workers in Spain.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  3. Validation of Short Measures of Work Ability for Research and Employee Surveys.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jan-Bennet VoltmerInstitute of Management & Organization (IMO), Leuphana University of Lüneburg, Wilschenbrucher Weg 84a, W.410, 21335, Lüneburg, Germany. voltmer@leuphana.de.ORCID 0000-0002-9103-3013
Jürgen DellerInstitute of Management & Organization (IMO), Leuphana University of Lüneburg, Wilschenbrucher Weg 84a, W.410, 21335, Lüneburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose The revised version of the Work Ability Survey (WAS-R) assesses work ability on several sub-scales at the intersection of personal and organizational capacity, thus adding to the measurement of work ability by integrating the holistic model. It, therefore, improves on two features of the current standard measurement tool of work ability, the Work Ability Index (WAI): (1) a ceiling effect and (2) limited detail due to a focus on physical health and personal capacity. Method In two samples (n

Indexed as

Work Capacity EvaluationAdultAgingEmploymentFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrganizational Case StudiesReproducibility of ResultsRetirementSurveys and QuestionnairesDemographic changeHealthOrganizational capacityPersonal capacityRetirement

Identifiers

PMID28741256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.