Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28741250›Full record

ArticleMycotoxin research2017

Effects of deoxynivalenol (DON) and its microbial biotransformation product deepoxy-deoxynivalenol (DOM-1) on a trout, pig, mouse, and human cell line.

Elisabeth Mayer, Barbara Novak, Alexandra Springler, Heidi E Schwartz-Zimmermann, Veronika Nagl, Nicole Reisinger, Sabine Hessenberger, Gerd Schatzmayr

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mycotoxin research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. 3-keto-DON, but Not 3-International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. The Effects of MixedToxins · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elisabeth MayerBIOMIN Research Center, Technopark 1, 3430, Tulln an der Donau, Austria. e.mayer@biomin.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2051-272X
Barbara NovakBIOMIN Research Center, Technopark 1, 3430, Tulln an der Donau, Austria.
Alexandra SpringlerBIOMIN Research Center, Technopark 1, 3430, Tulln an der Donau, Austria.
Heidi E Schwartz-ZimmermannChristian Doppler Laboratory for Mycotoxin Metabolism, Center for Analytical Chemistry, Department of Agrobiotechnology (IFA-Tulln), University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, 3430, Tulln an der Donau, Austria.
Veronika NaglBIOMIN Research Center, Technopark 1, 3430, Tulln an der Donau, Austria.
Nicole ReisingerBIOMIN Research Center, Technopark 1, 3430, Tulln an der Donau, Austria.
Sabine HessenbergerBIOMIN Research Center, Technopark 1, 3430, Tulln an der Donau, Austria.
Gerd SchatzmayrBIOMIN Research Center, Technopark 1, 3430, Tulln an der Donau, Austria.
Austrian Institute of Technology · ATBOKU University · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deoxynivalenol (DON), a trichothecene produced by various Fusarium species, is one of the most prevalent food- and feed-associated mycotoxins. The effects of DON and deepoxy-deoxynivalenol (DOM-1) were assessed in five different cell lines from different tissues and species starting from the first line of defense, the trout gill (RTgill-W1) and pig intestinal cells (IPEC-1 and IPEC-J2) over immune cells, as second line of defense (mouse macrophages RAW 264.7) to human liver cells (HepG2). Viability was assessed with a WST-1 assay, except for RTgill-W1, where a neutral red (NR) and sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay was performed. Additionally, more sensitive parameters, such as interleukin-, nitric oxide (NO)-, and albumin-release were determined. Viability was affected by DON at concentrations starting at 10 μmol/L (RTgill-W1), 0.9 μmol/L (IPEC-1), 3.5 μmol/L (IPEC-J2), and 0.9 μmol/L (HepG2), whereas DOM-1 did not have such an effect. Additionally, NO was decreased (0.84 μmol/L DON), whereas interleukin (IL)-6 was increased (0.42 μmol/L DON) in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated DON-, but not DOM-1-treated RAW cells. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α release, however, was not affected. Interestingly, albumin secretion of HepG2 cells was decreased by both DON and DOM-1 but at a much higher concentration for DOM-1 (228 versus 0.9 μmol/L for DON). 98.9% of DOM-1 was retrieved by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry at the end of the experiment, proving its stability. In this study, IL-6 was the most sensitive parameter, followed by NO and albumin release and viability for HepG2 and IPEC-1.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiotransformationCell LineCell SurvivalChromatography, LiquidCytokinesHumansMiceMycotoxinsSwineTandem Mass SpectrometryTrichothecenesTroutCytokinesdeepoxy-deoxynivalenoldeoxynivalenolMycotoxinsTrichothecenesCell cultureCell linesContaminationCytotoxicityFeedstuffFishIn vitroMetaboliteToxicityTransformation

Identifiers

PMID28741250
PMCPMC5644741
OpenAlexW2736755762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.