ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2017
Flow cytometric characterization of bacterial abundance and physiological status in a nitrifying-denitrifying activated sludge system treating landfill leachate.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prophage-Related GeneFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Flow cytometry has recently been presented as a research tool in the assessment of the viability/activity of activated sludge from municipal wastewater treatment plants, but it has not put in practice for industrial biotreatments yet. In this study, for the first time ever, the reliability and significance of the multiparameter flow cytometry applied to the biological nitrification-denitrification treatment of leachate have been evaluated. Using a double staining procedure (cFDA/PI), the viable, damaged, and dead subpopulations were determined, and the results were compared to those obtained with conventional methods, such as nitrogen and oxygen uptake rates or plate counting. Flow cytometry showed that viable cells represented approximately 47% of the total population, whereas active cells accounted for 90%. For both sludge from nitrification and denitrification processes, with less than 1% of them being also culturable in plate. Either flow cytometry or uptake rates revealed that health status of sludge remained constant throughout the biotreatment, which is consistent with the high recirculation rates. Under anaerobic starvation conditions, physiological status of sludge remained constant as well as specific oxygen and denitrification rates. Nevertheless, both the culturability in plate and the nitrification rate significantly decreased. These findings proved that multiparameter flow cytometry is a useful tool for the assessment of the viability and activity of sludge from a nitrification-denitrification biotreatment process. These results gathered all the bacterial communities in the sludge, so the decay in minority populations, such as nitrifying bacteria, requires the use of a complementary technique to evaluate specific activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.