Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28741158›Full record

ReviewGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2017

Intraocular lenses in age-related macular degeneration.

Andrzej Grzybowski, Weronika Wasinska-Borowiec, Jorge L Alio, Pedro Amat-Peral, Juan Tabernero

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The intraocular implant and visual rehabilitation improve the quality of life of elderly patients with geographic atrophy secondary to age-related macular degeneration.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Recent developments in cataract surgery.Annals of translational medicine · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Andrzej GrzybowskiChair of Ophthalmology, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland. ae.grzybowski@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3724-2391
Weronika Wasinska-BorowiecDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland.
Jorge L AlioVissum Corporation, Alicante, Spain.
Pedro Amat-PeralVissum Corporation, Alicante, Spain.
Juan TaberneroVision and Eye Research Unit, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.
Universitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx · ESUniversity of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn · PLAnglia Ruskin University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this work is to review the lenses, assessing their advantages and disadvantages. We describe a total of seven types of intraocular lenses (IOLs) recommended for age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

methodsWe used the PubMed web platform to search for implantable devices in various stages of AMD. We searched for both prospective and retrospective studies and also case reports.

resultsClinical results in AMD patients have been described for a total of seven types of IOLs recommended for AMD: an implantable miniature telescope (IMT), IOL-VIP System, Lipshitz macular implant (LMI), sulcus-implanted Lipshitz macular implant, LMI-SI, Fresnel Prism Intraocular Lens, iolAMD and Scharioth Macula Lens.

conclusionsWe conclude that to objectively ascertain the effectiveness and safety of these lenses, further independent clinical studies with longer follow-up data are necessary prior to the general use of these optical devices.

Indexed as

Lenses, IntraocularVisual AcuityHumansProsthesis DesignWet Macular DegenerationFresnel prism intraocular lensImplantable miniature telescopeiolAMDIOL-VIP systemLipshitz macular implantScharioth macula lens

Identifiers

PMID28741158
PMCPMC5554271
OpenAlexW2737899922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.