Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28741127›Full record

ArticleOecologia2017

Wing morphology, winter ecology, and fecundity selection: evidence for sex-dependence in barn swallows (Hirundo rustica).

Nicola Saino, Roberto Ambrosini, Manuela Caprioli, Felix Liechti, Andrea Romano, Diego Rubolini, Chiara Scandolara

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicola SainoDepartment of Environmental Science and Policy, University of Milan, via Celoria 26, 20133, Milan, Italy. nicola.saino@unimi.it.
Roberto AmbrosiniDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza della Scienza 2, 20126, Milan, Italy.
Manuela CaprioliDepartment of Environmental Science and Policy, University of Milan, via Celoria 26, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Felix LiechtiSwiss Ornithological Institute, Seerose 1, 6204, Sempach, Switzerland.
Andrea RomanoDepartment of Environmental Science and Policy, University of Milan, via Celoria 26, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Diego RuboliniDepartment of Environmental Science and Policy, University of Milan, via Celoria 26, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Chiara ScandolaraDepartment of Environmental Science and Policy, University of Milan, via Celoria 26, 20133, Milan, Italy.
University of Milan · ITSwiss Ornithological Institute · CHUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Variation in wing morphology results from the combination of diverse selection pressures. Wing feather morphology within species varies with sex and ontogenetic effects, and also with ecological factors. Yet, the direction of causation for the wing morphology-ecology association remains to be elucidated. Under the 'ecology-dependence' hypothesis, wing morphology covaries with ecological conditions, because the latter affect feather molt. Alternatively, the 'habitat choice' hypothesis posits that individuals with different wing morphology choose different habitats because of the habitat-dependent advantages of a specific wing morphology. We tested these competing hypotheses in the migratory, aerially insectivorous barn swallow (Hirundo rustica). We quantified wing morphology (isometric size, pointedness, and convexity) on the same individuals during consecutive breeding seasons (i.e., before and after molt in sub-Saharan wintering areas) and located wintering areas using light-level geolocators. Wing pointedness of females but not males during 1 year negatively correlated with vegetation vigor (gauged by the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index; NDVI) in the African area where individuals spent the next winter. Partial least-squares path modelling showed that the association between wing morphology and NDVI was sex-dependent. Conversely, NDVI during wintering did not predict wing morphology in the next breeding season. Because wing morphology can have carry-over effects on subsequent performance, we investigated selection on wing traits and found strong positive fecundity selection on wing size of females. Our results suggest that female barn swallows choose their wintering habitat depending on their wing morphology. In addition, directional fecundity selection operates on females, suggesting sex-dependence of current selection on the flight apparatus.

Indexed as

Animal MigrationEcologyFeathersFertilitySwallowsAfrica, NorthernAnimalsBreedingEcosystemFemaleMaleMoltingPhenotypeSeasonsAerodynamic adaptationsHabitat choiceMigrationSex-dependenceStructural equation modelling

Identifiers

PMID28741127
OpenAlexW2739068722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.