Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28741102›Full record

SynthesisNeurocritical care2017

The Range of Neurological Complications in Chikungunya Fever.

T Cerny, M Schwarz, U Schwarz, J Lemant, P Gérardin, E Keller

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurocritical care, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Chikungunya and Dengue Encephalitis: A Critical Narrative Review.Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology · 2025
    Article
  20. Review

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

T CernyNeurointensive Care Unit, University Hospital Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3404-7769
M SchwarzDepartment of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
U SchwarzDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
J LemantIntensive Care Unit, CHU de la Réunion, Saint Pierre, Réunion, France.
P GérardinINSERM CIC 1410, CHU de la Réunion, Saint Pierre, Réunion, France.
E KellerNeurointensive Care Unit, University Hospital Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland. emanuela.keller@usz.ch.
University Hospital of Zurich · CHCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de La Réunion · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChikungunya fever is a globally spreading mosquito-borne disease that shows an unexpected neurovirulence. Even though the neurological complications have been a major cause of intensive care unit admission and death, to date, there is no systematic analysis of their spectrum available.

objectiveTo review evidence of neurological manifestations in Chikungunya fever and map their epidemiology, clinical spectrum, pathomechanisms, diagnostics, therapies and outcomes.

methodsCase report and systematic review of the literature followed established guidelines. All cases found were assessed using a 5-step clinical diagnostic algorithm assigning categories A-C, category A representing the highest level of quality. Only A and B cases were considered for further analysis. After general analysis, cases were clustered according to geospatial criteria for subgroup analysis.

resultsThirty-six of 1196 studies were included, yielding 130 cases. Nine were ranked as category A (diagnosis of Neuro-Chikungunya probable), 55 as B (plausible), and 51 as C (disputable). In 15 cases, alternative diagnoses were more likely. Patient age distribution was bimodal with a mean of 49 years and a second peak in infants. Fifty percent of the cases occurred in patients <45 years with no reported comorbidity. Frequent diagnoses were encephalitis, optic neuropathy, neuroretinitis, and Guillain-Barré syndrome. Neurologic conditions showing characteristics of a direct viral pathomechanism showed a peak in infants and a second one in elder patients, and complications and neurologic sequelae were more frequent in these groups. Autoimmune-mediated conditions appeared mainly in patients over 20 years and tended to show longer latencies and better outcomes. Geospatial subgrouping of case reports from either India or Réunion revealed diverging phenotypic trends (Réunion: 88% direct viral vs. India: 81% autoimmune).

conclusionsDirect viral forms of Neuro-Chikungunya seem to occur particularly in infants and elderly patients, while autoimmune forms have to be also considered in middle-aged, previously healthy patients, especially after an asymptomatic interval. This knowledge will help to identify future Neuro-Chikungunya cases and to improve outcome especially in autoimmune-mediated conditions. The genetics of Chikungunya virus might play a key role in determining the course of neuropathogenesis. With further research, this could prove diagnostically significant.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChikungunya FeverChildChild, PreschoolEncephalitisGuillain-Barre SyndromeHumansInfantMiddle AgedOptic Nerve DiseasesRetinitisYoung AdultChikungunya feverChikungunya virusNeuro-ChikungunyaNeurological complications

Identifiers

PMID28741102
OpenAlexW2617005787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.