ArticleArchives of microbiology2017
Detection of Verticillium species in Swedish soils using real-time PCR.
Article in Archives of microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Verticillium Wilt of Cotton: Identification and Detection of the Causal Pathogen and Its Control.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Fungal foe: exploring cotton's physiological responses to Verticillium wilt.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Agrivoltaic panel shading influences soil nutrient dynamics and microbial community structure in a wheat-cultivated field.PloS one · 2026Article
- Moderate thinning enhances soil carbon-nitrogen cycling and microbial diversity in degraded mixed forests.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Verticillium longisporum phospholipase VlsPLAMolecular plant pathology · 2023Article
- A Verticillium longisporum pleiotropic drug transporter determines tolerance to the plant host β-pinene monoterpene.Molecular plant pathology · 2022Article
- Characterization and Control ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Opportunities and Challenges in Studies of Host-Pathogen Interactions and Management ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Triplex Real-Time PCR Approach for the Detection of Crucial Fungal Berry Pathogens-International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Biological Control ofMicroorganisms · 2020Article
- Alternative Molecular-Based Diagnostic Methods of Plant Pathogenic Fungi Affecting Berry Crops-A Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- Development of a decision support system for managingJournal of nematology · 2019Article
- Analysis of the hybrid genomes of two field isolates of the soil-borne fungal species Verticillium longisporum.BMC genomics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Verticillium species are soilborne plant pathogens, responsible for big yield losses worldwide. Here, we report improved procedures to generate DNA from Verticillium species imbedded in farm soils. Using new genomic sequence information, primers for V. dahliae, V. albo-atrum, V. tricorpus, and V. longisporum were designed. In a survey of 429 samples from intensively farmed soil of two Swedish regions, only V. dahliae and V. longisporum were identified. A bias towards V. longisporum (40%) was seen in the south, whereas V. dahliae was more frequent in the western region (19%). Analyses of soil and leaf samples from 20 sugar beet fields, where foliar wilting had been observed, revealed V. dahliae DNA in all leaf and soil samples and V. longisporum in 18 soil samples, illustrating host choice and longevity of the V. longisporum microsclerotia. This study demonstrates the applicability of new molecular diagnostic tools that are important for growers of variable crops.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.