Coronary calcium scoring of CT attenuation correction scans: Automatic, manual, or visual?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Volume of hyperintense inflammation (VHI): A quantitative imaging biomarker of inflammation load in spondyloarthritis, enabled by human-machine cooperation.PloS one · 2023
   Article
2. Choosing between anatomy and function is not always evident for the heart of end-stage renal disease patients. How low can we go?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
   Article
3. Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2018. Part 1 of 2: Positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019
   Review

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Automatic determination of cardiovascular risk by CT attenuation correction maps in Rb-82 PET/CT.2018

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as