Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28741057›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2018

The role of angiography in the congruence of cardiovascular measurements between autopsy and postmortem imaging.

Renaud Troxler, Costin Minoiu, Paul Vaucher, Katarzyna Michaud, Francesco Doenz, Kewin Ducrot, Silke Grabherr

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The current state of forensic imaging - post mortem imaging.International journal of legal medicine · 2025
    Review
  4. Cardiac hypertrophy at autopsy.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2021
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Renaud TroxlerUniversity Center of Legal Medicine Lausanne-Geneva, Chemin de la Vulliette 4, 1000, 25, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Costin MinoiuUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila", Bucharest, Romania.
Paul VaucherUniversity Center of Legal Medicine Lausanne-Geneva, Chemin de la Vulliette 4, 1000, 25, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Katarzyna MichaudUniversity Center of Legal Medicine Lausanne-Geneva, Chemin de la Vulliette 4, 1000, 25, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Francesco DoenzDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Kewin DucrotUniversity Center of Legal Medicine Lausanne-Geneva, Chemin de la Vulliette 4, 1000, 25, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Silke GrabherrUniversity Center of Legal Medicine Lausanne-Geneva, Chemin de la Vulliette 4, 1000, 25, Lausanne, Switzerland. Silke.Grabherr@chuv.ch.
University Centre of Legal Medicine · CHCarol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROHES-SO Fribourg · CHUniversity Hospital of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPostmortem CT angiography is the method of choice for the postmortem imaging investigations of the cardiovascular (CV) system. However, autopsy still remains the gold standard for CV measurement. Nevertheless, there are not any studies on CV measurements on the multi-phase postmortem angiography (MPMCTA) which includes comparisons with autopsy. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare CV measurements between the native CT scan and the three phases of the MPMCTA to find out which of these modalities correlate the best with autopsy measurements.

methodsFor this study, we selected retrospectively 50 postmortem cases that underwent both MPMCTA and autopsy. A comparison was carried out between the CV measurements obtained with imaging (aorta; heart cavities and cardiac wall thicknesses; maximum cardiac diameter and cardiothoracic ratio) and at the autopsy (aorta; cardiac valves, ventricular thicknesses, and weight).

resultsOur results show that the dynamic phase displays an advantage for the measurement of the aortas. However, the MPMCTA is not accurate to measure the cardiac wall thicknesses. The measurements of the heart cavities show no correlation with the heart valves. The cardiothoracic ratio measured by the MPMCTA shows no correlation with the heart weight. Nevertheless, the maximum cardiac diameter exhibits a correlation with the latter on the venous and dynamic phase.

conclusionsThese results show that only few CV parameters measured with imaging correlate with measurement obtained at the autopsy. These results indicate that in order to better estimate values obtained at the autopsy, we need to define new reference values for the CV measurement on MPMCTA.

Indexed as

AutopsyComputed Tomography AngiographyAortaFemaleForensic PathologyHeartHeart VentriclesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardiumOrgan SizeRetrospective StudiesAutopsyCardiovascular measurementForensic imagingMPMCTA

Identifiers

PMID28741057
OpenAlexW2736553964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.