Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28741052›Full record

ArticleAnnals of nuclear medicine2017

Applying near-infrared photoimmunotherapy to B-cell lymphoma: comparative evaluation with radioimmunotherapy in tumor xenografts.

Yusri-Dwi Heryanto, Hirofumi Hanaoka, Takahito Nakajima, Aiko Yamaguchi, Yoshito Tsushima

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of nuclear medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Near-infrared fluorescence imaging in immunotherapy.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2020
    Review
  9. Highlights from 2017: impactful topics published in the Annals of Nuclear Medicine.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yusri-Dwi HeryantoDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 39-22 Showa-machi 3-chome, Maebashi, 371-8511, Japan.
Hirofumi HanaokaDepartment of Bioimaging Information Analysis, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 39-22 Showa-machi 3-chome, Maebashi, 371-8511, Japan. hanaokah@gunma-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2421-7397
Takahito NakajimaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 39-22 Showa-machi 3-chome, Maebashi, 371-8511, Japan.
Aiko YamaguchiDepartment of Bioimaging Information Analysis, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 39-22 Showa-machi 3-chome, Maebashi, 371-8511, Japan.
Yoshito TsushimaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 39-22 Showa-machi 3-chome, Maebashi, 371-8511, Japan.
Gunma University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRadioimmunotherapy (RIT) has proven effective for patients with relapsed and refractory lymphoma. However, new types of therapy are strongly desired as B-cell lymphoma remains incurable for many patients. Photoimmunotherapy (PIT) is an emerging targeted cancer therapy that uses photosensitizer (IR700)-conjugated monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to specifically kill cancer cells. To evaluate the usefulness and potential role of PIT for treating B-cell lymphoma in a comparison with RIT, we performed in vivo PIT and RIT studies with an IR700 or

methodsIR700 or

resultsThe in vitro studies revealed that Ramos was more sensitive than RPMI 1788 to PIT. The therapeutic effect of PIT with 500 µg IR700-NuB2 was superior to any other therapies against aggressive Ramos tumors, whereas RIT showed the highest therapeutic effect in indolent RPMI 1788 tumors. Since the uptake levels and intratumoral distribution of IR700-NuB2 were comparable in both tumors, a possible cause of this difference is the tumor growth rate. The PIT with 500 µg (IR700-NuB2) group showed a significantly greater therapeutic effect than the PIT with 100 µg group due to the higher and more homogeneous tumor distribution of IR700-NuB2.

conclusionsPIT was effective for both indolent and aggressive B-cell lymphoma, and the higher dose provided a better therapeutic effect. In aggressive tumors, PIT was more effective than RIT. Thus, PIT would be a promising strategy for the locoregional treatment or control of B-cell lymphoma. Since PIT and RIT have distinctive advantages over each other, they could play complementary rather than competitive roles in B-cell lymphoma treatment.

Indexed as

Cell Transformation, NeoplasticInfrared RaysAnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntigens, CD20Cell Line, TumorFemaleImmunoconjugatesLymphoma, B-CellMicePhotosensitizing AgentsRadioimmunotherapyTissue DistributionYttrium RadioisotopesAntibodies, MonoclonalAntigens, CD20ImmunoconjugatesPhotosensitizing AgentsYttrium RadioisotopesAnti-CD20 antibodyB-cell lymphomaPhotoimmunotherapyRadioimmunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID28741052
PMCPMC5651713
OpenAlexW2736980887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.