Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28740932›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology

Importance of baseline PET/CT imaging on radiation field design and relapse rates in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma.

Nick Figura, Stella Flampouri, Nancy P Mendenhall, Christopher G Morris, Barry McCook, Savas Ozdemir, William Slayton, Eric Sandler, Bradford S Hoppe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Value of PET imaging for radiation therapy.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. The Utility of PET/CT in the Planning of External Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2018
    Article
  8. Consolidative proton therapy after chemotherapy for patients with Hodgkin lymphoma.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nick FiguraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida.
Stella FlampouriDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida.
Nancy P MendenhallDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida.
Christopher G MorrisDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida.
Barry McCookDepartment of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida.
Savas OzdemirDepartment of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida.
William SlaytonDivision of Hematology & Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida.
Eric SandlerNemours Children's Specialty Care, Jacksonville, Florida.
Bradford S HoppeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida.
University of Florida · USFlorida College · USNemours Children's Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study analyzed the impact of pretreatment positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scans on involved site radiation therapy (ISRT) field design and pattern of relapse among patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-seven patients with stage I or II HL who received first-line chemotherapy followed by consolidative ISRT to all initial sites of disease were enrolled in an institutional review board-approved outcomes-tracking protocol between January 2009 and December 2014. Patients underwent standard-of-care follow-up. Relapse-free survival (RFS) was evaluated using a Kaplan-Meier analysis and cohort comparisons using a χ

resultsThirty-one patients underwent (PET/CT) scans before chemotherapy and 6 did not because of a lack of insurance (n = 2), inpatient chemotherapy administration (n = 2), scheduling conflicts (n = 1), and unknown reasons (n = 1). The median follow-up was 46 months, and the 4-year RFS rate was 92%. Patients without pretreatment PET imaging were more likely to experience disease relapse (4-year RFS, 97% vs. 67%;

conclusionsPatients with stage I/II HL who receive ISRT without pretreatment PET/CT scans appear to have an increased risk for relapse in adjacent nodal stations just outside the radiation field. A larger cohort with a longer follow-up is needed to confirm these findings.

Identifiers

PMID28740932
PMCPMC5514251
OpenAlexW2578177334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.