Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28740827›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia research. Cognition2017

Self versus informant reports on the specific levels of functioning scale: Relationships to depression and cognition in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder.

Julia Ermel, Cameron S Carter, James M Gold, Angus W MacDonald, J Daniel Ragland, Steven M Silverstein, Milton E Strauss, Deanna M Barch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia research. Cognition, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Julia ErmelDepartment of Psychological & Brain Science, Washington University, Box 1125, One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO, 63130, United States.
Cameron S CarterUniversity of California at Davis, Imaging Research Center, 4701 X Street, Sacramento, CA 95817, United States.
James M GoldMaryland Psychiatric Research Center, Dept of Psychiatry, University of Maryland Baltimore, PO Box 21247, Baltimore, MD 21228, United States.
Angus W MacDonaldDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States.
J Daniel RaglandUniversity of California at Davis, Imaging Research Center, 4701 X Street, Sacramento, CA 95817, United States.
Steven M SilversteinRutgers University, Department of Psychiatry, 671 Hoes Lane West, Piscataway, NJ 08854, United States.
Milton E StraussCase Western Reserve University, PO Box 3837, Corrales, NM 87048, United States.
Deanna M BarchDepartment of Psychological & Brain Science, Washington University, Box 1125, One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO, 63130, United States.
University of California, Davis · USWashington University in St. Louis · USCase Western Reserve University · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Cognitive Neurocomputational Task Reliability and Clinical Applications ConsortiumR01MH084840 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Deanna Barch, Cameron S. Carter · 2008 to 2026
$8.5M
5/5-Cognitive Neuroscience Task Reliability & Clinical Applications ConsortiumR01MH084861 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI MACDONALD, ANGUS W · 2008 to 2024
$3.8M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH084840NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH084861
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of the current study was to examine the relationships between insight and both cognitive function and depression in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder, and to determine if there were similar relationships across diagnostic categories. We examined discrepancies between self and informant reports of function on the Specific levels of function scale as a metric of insight for interpersonal, social acceptance, work and activities. We examined two samples of individuals with schizophrenia and/or schizoaffective disorder (Ns of 188 and 67 respectively). In Sample 1, cognition was measured using the Dot Probe Expectancy Task. In Sample 2, cognition was measured by averaging several subtests from the MATRICS consensus cognitive battery, as well as additional measures of working memory. In both samples, depression was measured using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. In both samples, we found significant relationships between worse cognition and overestimations of work function, as well as between higher depression levels and underestimation of interpersonal function. These relationships were specific to interpersonal and work function, with significantly stronger correlations with interpersonal and work function compared to the other areas of function. Similar results were found across diagnostic categories. These results have important implications for treatment planning, as they suggest the need to take into account depression and cognitive function when evaluating the patient's self-report of function, and highlight the utility of informant reports in evaluating function and treatment planning. Further, they add to the literature on the similarity across schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder in a variety of pathological mechanisms.

Indexed as

CognitionDepressionFunctionInsightInterpersonalPsychosis

Identifiers

PMID28740827
PMCPMC5514389
OpenAlexW2610316310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.