Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28740797›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2017

Pain Management in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction.

Ibrahim Khansa, Andrew Koogler, Jesse Richards, Richard Bryant, Jeffrey E Janis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Use of Muscle Relaxants for Acute Postoperative Pain: A Practical Review.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Multimodal Analgesia in the Aesthetic Plastic Surgery: Concepts and Strategies.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2022
    Article
  8. Building a Center for Abdominal Core Health: The Importance of a Holistic Multidisciplinary Approach.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. The 4 Principles of Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ibrahim KhansaDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio; and Department of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Andrew KooglerDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio; and Department of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Jesse RichardsDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio; and Department of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Richard BryantDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio; and Department of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Jeffrey E JanisDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio; and Department of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn abdominal wall reconstruction, adequate pain control and minimization of narcotic consumption are essential to improving patient outcomes and satisfaction. Previous studies have examined the role of individual strategies, such as neuraxial analgesia and multimodal analgesia. However, there has not been a study that examined all potential determinants of postoperative narcotic requirements, including intraoperative strategies.

methodsConsecutive patients who underwent abdominal wall reconstruction were reviewed. Preoperative factors (chronic preoperative narcotic usage, indication for abdominal wall reconstruction, administration of neuraxial analgesia), intraoperative factors (intraoperative narcotics administered, method of mesh fixation), and postoperative factors (multimodal analgesia, complications) were collected. The main outcomes were daily amount of opioids used and length of hospital stay.

resultsNinety-three patients were included in the study. Patients who had an epidural required lower doses of opioids postoperatively, while those on chronic preoperative opioids, those whose mesh was fixated using transfascial sutures, and those who received large doses of opioids intraoperatively required higher doses of postoperative opioids. Hospital length of stay was longer in patients who received transfascially sutured mesh and those on chronic opioids preoperatively.

conclusionsThis study provides potential strategies to improve pain control and minimize narcotic consumption postoperatively in patients undergoing abdominal wall reconstruction. Intraoperative administration of opioids should be minimized to avoid the development of tolerance. Epidural analgesia reduces postoperative narcotic requirement and may be especially beneficial in patients at highest risk for postoperative pain, including those on chronic opioids, and those in whom transfascial sutures are used for mesh fixation.

Identifiers

PMID28740797
PMCPMC5505858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.