Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28740766›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2017

Early Cleft Lip Repair Revisited: A Safe and Effective Approach Utilizing a Multidisciplinary Protocol.

Jeff A Hammoudeh, Thomas A Imahiyerobo, Fan Liang, Artur Fahradyan, Leo Urbinelli, Jennifer Lau, Marla Matar, William Magee, Mark Urata

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prerepair Mortality in Cleft Lip and/or Palate: A Retrospective Analysis of Early Childhood Deaths.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Surgeon Perspectives on Cleft Lip and Palate Repair in Patients With Life-Limiting and Terminal Illnesses: An ACPA Member Survey.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. A Summary of the Existing Data on Cleft Surgical Outcomes: What Do We Not Know?Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Cleft Care.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jeff A HammoudehDivision of Plastic Surgery, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Calif.; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keck School of Medicine at USC, Calif.; Division of Plastic Surgery, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Medical Center, N.Y.; and Department of Anesthesiology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Calif.
Thomas A ImahiyeroboDivision of Plastic Surgery, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Calif.; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keck School of Medicine at USC, Calif.; Division of Plastic Surgery, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Medical Center, N.Y.; and Department of Anesthesiology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Calif.
Fan LiangDivision of Plastic Surgery, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Calif.; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keck School of Medicine at USC, Calif.; Division of Plastic Surgery, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Medical Center, N.Y.; and Department of Anesthesiology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Calif.
Artur FahradyanDivision of Plastic Surgery, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Calif.; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keck School of Medicine at USC, Calif.; Division of Plastic Surgery, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Medical Center, N.Y.; and Department of Anesthesiology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Calif.
Leo UrbinelliDivision of Plastic Surgery, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Calif.; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keck School of Medicine at USC, Calif.; Division of Plastic Surgery, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Medical Center, N.Y.; and Department of Anesthesiology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Calif.
Jennifer LauDivision of Plastic Surgery, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Calif.; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keck School of Medicine at USC, Calif.; Division of Plastic Surgery, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Medical Center, N.Y.; and Department of Anesthesiology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Calif.
Marla MatarDivision of Plastic Surgery, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Calif.; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keck School of Medicine at USC, Calif.; Division of Plastic Surgery, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Medical Center, N.Y.; and Department of Anesthesiology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Calif.
William MageeDivision of Plastic Surgery, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Calif.; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keck School of Medicine at USC, Calif.; Division of Plastic Surgery, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Medical Center, N.Y.; and Department of Anesthesiology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Calif.
Mark UrataDivision of Plastic Surgery, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Calif.; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keck School of Medicine at USC, Calif.; Division of Plastic Surgery, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Medical Center, N.Y.; and Department of Anesthesiology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Calif.
Children's Hospital of Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe optimal timing for cleft lip repair has yet to be established. Advances in neonatal anesthesia, along with a growing body of literature, suggesting benefits of earlier cleft lip and nasal repair, have set the stage for a reexamination of current practices.

methodsIn this prospective study, cleft lip and nasal repair occurred on average at 34.8 days (13-69 days). Nasal correction was achieved primarily through molding the nasal cartilage without the placement of nasal sutures at the time of repair. A standardized anesthetic protocol aimed at limiting neurotoxicity was utilized in all cases. Anesthetic and postoperative complications were assessed. A 3-dimensional nasal analysis compared pre- and postoperative nasal symmetry for unilateral clefts. Surveys assessed familial response to repair.

resultsThirty-two patients were included (27 unilateral and 5 bilateral clefts). In this study, the overall complication rate was 3.1%. Anthropometric measurements taken from 3-dimensional-image models showed statistically significant improvement in ratios of nostril height (preoperative mean, 0.59; postoperative mean, 0.80), nasal base width (preoperative mean, 1.96; postoperative mean, 1.12), columella length (preoperative mean, 0.62; postoperative mean, 0.89; and columella angle (preoperative mean, 30.73; postoperative mean, 9.1). Survey data indicated that families uniformly preferred earlier repair.

conclusionsWe present evidence that early cleft lip and nasal repair can be performed safely and is effective at improving nasal symmetry without the placement of any nasal sutures. Utilization of this protocol has the potential to be a paradigm shift in the treatment of cleft lip and nasal deformity.

Identifiers

PMID28740766
PMCPMC5505827
OpenAlexW2732928545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.