ArticleActa naturae
Comparing New-Generation Candidate Vaccines against Human Orthopoxvirus Infections.
Article in Acta naturae. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
An Open-label Controlled Study of the Safety and Tolerability of the Live Cell-based Vaccine Against Smallpox and Other Orthopoxvirus Infections (VAC∆6 Vaccine) Based on Vaccinia Virus, in Volunteers Aged 18-40 Years
Double-blind, Comparative, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study on Immunogenicity, Reactogenicity and Safety of Live Cell-based Vaccine Against Smallpox and Other Orthopoxvirus Infections (VACΔ6 Vaccine) in Volunteers Aged 18-60 Years
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Monkey pox (Mpox): pathogenesis, genetic shifts, vaccination strategies and clinical insights.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- Review
- Monkeypox 2022 Identify-Isolate-Inform: A 3I Tool for frontline clinicians for a zoonosis with escalating human community transmission.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022Article
- New p35 (H3L) Epitope Involved in Vaccinia Virus Neutralization and Its Deimmunization.Viruses · 2022Article
- Confronting the threat of bioterrorism: realities, challenges, and defensive strategies.The Lancet. Infectious diseases · 2019Review
- 40 Years without Smallpox.Acta naturaeArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The lack of immunity to the variola virus in the population, increasingly more frequent cases of human orthopoxvirus infection, and increased risk of the use of the variola virus (VARV) as a bioterrorism agent call for the development of modern, safe vaccines against orthopoxvirus infections. We previously developed a polyvalent DNA vaccine based on five VARV antigens and an attenuated variant of the vaccinia virus (VACV) with targeted deletion of six genes (VACΔ6). Independent experiments demonstrated that triple immunization with a DNA vaccine and double immunization with VACΔ6 provide protection to mice against a lethal dose (10 LD
Indexed as
Identifiers
28740731PMC5509005W2945355898What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.